Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EUTM reform – the sequel

Fans of the EU trade mark (EUTM) will all have enjoyed last year’s trade mark reform package, which starred the notorious Section 28(8) declarations. But did you know that the sequel is released on October 1 this year, and will feature changes affecting examination, oppositions and appeals?

This article is brought to you by our Trademark Times 2017 sponsors:

The trailer for “EUTM reform – the sequel” was adopted by the European Commission last Thursday, in the form of the Commission Implementing Regulation and Commission Delegated Regulation. These are due to be published officially by the end of July and will apply from October 1.

This so-called secondary legislation sets out the rules for the reforms that come into effect on that date, as Tomás Eichenberg of the European Commission explained in a session at the INTA Annual Meeting yesterday.

Of most immediate interest to trademark applicants will likely be the new rules on how to apply for non-traditional trademarks following the abolition of the graphical representation requirement. Eichenberg said the rules are designed to provide “flexibility” explaining: “You can still represent your trademark graphically.” EUIPO has provided guidance on formats that will be accepted (see illustration).

He added that the Delegated Regulation will promote consistency: “It will make office procedures more predictable.” Also on May 17, as part of a codification exercise, the Commission approved a final text for the EUTM Regulation, which comprises 212 articles. That text, which Eichenberg described as “an important new piece of legislation”, is expected to be published in the next few weeks.

The EUIPO is already working on a new version of its Guidelines, taking into account the changes coming in October, and a draft was published last week, as Michael Hawkins of Noerr explained. These address everything from the procedural changes to fee amounts, the renewal date and the filing of priority claims through to the written evidence requirements and the new EU certification mark. An important change, said Hawkins, is that acquired distinctiveness through use may be invoked as a subsidiary claim. “That will hopefully allow the case to be heard first on inherent distinctiveness and if that doesn’t succeed then on acquired distinctiveness,” he said.

There are also important reforms to opposition, cancellation and appeal proceedings, said Hawkins: “There are some interesting changes at all levels of the Office.”

If all that does not sate your appetite for trademark reform, then András Jókutí of the Hungarian IP Office previewed the next instalment, which will see national offices implementing the changes required by the EU Trade Mark Directive over the next few years.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Varuni Paranavitane, of counsel at Finnegan, examines recent decisions by US and UK courts to demonstrate the proof of infringement that was required
The Federal Circuit will also narrow its investigation into Judge Newman to focus on whether her failure to cooperate constitutes misconduct
The management board will send three names to the Council of the EU for a final decision
Sources say a decision by the IP High Court will make it easier for rights owners to fight infringement
Seán Kelly asked the European Commission how it intends to ensure the EUIPO executive director vote, due tomorrow, will be fair and transparent
Counsel from BMW and Finnegan explain how they got an NPE to sign a covenant agreeing not to sue the automaker ever again
The blue checkmark could be a good tool, but it’s unclear how widespread its adoption will be, say in-house sources
Sarah Harris, partner at Williams & Connolly, reveals how her team secured a copyright victory at SCOTUS and reflects on why the case matters
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A Court of Appeal judge demanded respect for solicitor-judges after reprimanding a barrister for his 'unwise' words