EUTM reform – the sequel

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EUTM reform – the sequel

Fans of the EU trade mark (EUTM) will all have enjoyed last year’s trade mark reform package, which starred the notorious Section 28(8) declarations. But did you know that the sequel is released on October 1 this year, and will feature changes affecting examination, oppositions and appeals?

This article is brought to you by our Trademark Times 2017 sponsors:




The trailer for “EUTM reform – the sequel” was adopted by the European Commission last Thursday, in the form of the Commission Implementing Regulation and Commission Delegated Regulation. These are due to be published officially by the end of July and will apply from October 1.

This so-called secondary legislation sets out the rules for the reforms that come into effect on that date, as Tomás Eichenberg of the European Commission explained in a session at the INTA Annual Meeting yesterday.

Of most immediate interest to trademark applicants will likely be the new rules on how to apply for non-traditional trademarks following the abolition of the graphical representation requirement. Eichenberg said the rules are designed to provide “flexibility” explaining: “You can still represent your trademark graphically.” EUIPO has provided guidance on formats that will be accepted (see illustration).

He added that the Delegated Regulation will promote consistency: “It will make office procedures more predictable.” Also on May 17, as part of a codification exercise, the Commission approved a final text for the EUTM Regulation, which comprises 212 articles. That text, which Eichenberg described as “an important new piece of legislation”, is expected to be published in the next few weeks.

The EUIPO is already working on a new version of its Guidelines, taking into account the changes coming in October, and a draft was published last week, as Michael Hawkins of Noerr explained. These address everything from the procedural changes to fee amounts, the renewal date and the filing of priority claims through to the written evidence requirements and the new EU certification mark. An important change, said Hawkins, is that acquired distinctiveness through use may be invoked as a subsidiary claim. “That will hopefully allow the case to be heard first on inherent distinctiveness and if that doesn’t succeed then on acquired distinctiveness,” he said.

There are also important reforms to opposition, cancellation and appeal proceedings, said Hawkins: “There are some interesting changes at all levels of the Office.”

If all that does not sate your appetite for trademark reform, then András Jókutí of the Hungarian IP Office previewed the next instalment, which will see national offices implementing the changes required by the EU Trade Mark Directive over the next few years.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article