Greece: Economic crisis can influence judges’ decisions
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: Economic crisis can influence judges’ decisions

A recent judgment of the multi-member Specialist IP Court of Athens has ruled – by a 2-1 majority of its members – that there is a likelihood of consumers being confused in a trade mark infringement case, but the economic crisis in Greece resulted in an interesting dissenting opinion. In the case in question, the plaintiff US Company, E Entertainment Television LLC, argued that it broadcast the world-famous news channel "E" in Greece, among other countries, and that it is available through a subscriber platform. It is also the owner of the relevant European and national trade marks E! and E Entertainment Television.

The defendants broadcast in Greece through a digital channel, and internationally through an internet TV channel using live streaming technology under the distinctive element E and E International, and are also the owners of the national trade mark E-Channel.

The majority judgment ruled that there is a strong visual, phonetic and conceptual similarity between E! and E, since they are both single-letter indications in capital letters, and have the same meaning, while the differences between them, arising from identifying elements (the addition of an exclamation mark in the former, the existence of a device and a colour mark in the latter), means that they are not identical, but are still similar.

Moreover, as regards the users of the two television services, the judgment ruled that the television audience is the same, notwithstanding the fact that the defendant's TV channel is a free-reception channel with a Greek language schedule of broad content, compared to the plaintiff's channel, which is accessible through subscriber digital platforms and has a pure entertainment schedule in the English language with Greek subtitles.

However, in a dissenting opinion, one judge argued that the trade marks are visually, phonetically and conceptually different. Moreover, the opinion distinguishes between TV audiences with and without access to subscriber digital platforms, which, at a cost of more than €50 per month, are seen as a luxury in view of the economic crisis affecting Greece.

On this basis, the dissenting opinion argued that there is no likelihood of confusion, because the television services under the mark E! provide an English-language schedule with Greek subtitles whose content is limited to the lifestyle of foreign celebrities, accessible only through subscriber platforms to approximately 670,000 consumers, while the services under the element E are exclusively provided in Greek, are of a wider content and are available to all 7 million Greek viewers.

This dissenting opinion indicates that the economic crisis in Greece can affect judges' decisions.

Maria Kilimiris

Patrinos & Kilimiris

7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.

GR-11528 Athens


Tel: +30210 7222906, 7222050

Fax: +30210 7222889

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Gift this article