France: Beware the impact of corporate restructuring on licences
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Beware the impact of corporate restructuring on licences

Trade mark and patent licence agreements generally include provisions regarding the transferability of the agreement to third parties.

Such agreements are frequently concluded in consideration of the person of the licensor or the licensee and include clauses providing that any transfer is subject to the prior consent of either party.

It is also very common that companies and groups of companies be affected by reorganisation or change in capital control which may involve mergers or an equivalent procedure unique to France (called TUP) consisting of the dissolution of a company further to the collection of all the capital shares in hands of its only shareholder. Both procedures involve the complete transfer of all the assets (including IP rights) and debts of the prior company to the surviving company.

Companies are used to thinking about the consequences of the transfer on their IP rights portfolio but rarely about the consequences on their licence agreements.

In this case decided on April 14 2016 by the Paris Court of First Instance, the licensee realised its mistake too late.

Laguiole Licences SAS granted a licence to Koox on the trade marks Laguiole and Bee design for manufacturing and selling cooking devices. It was stated in the agreement, signed on June 1 2011, that the licence was finalised in consideration of the person of the licensee and was not transferable without the prior written consent of the licensor.

On June 22 2012 Koox was dissolved further to the collection of all capital shares in the hands of its only shareholder Der Grune, to which all the assets and debts of Koox were thereby transferred.

Koox did not pay the royalties due further to the agreement and the licensor claimed for this payment, first with Der Grune as successor in title to Koox, and then before the Court.

Der Grune filed the action before the Court for obtaining the termination of the licence agreement, considering it was still the licensee in accordance with the licence granted to Koox.

The Court held that the licence agreement was terminated at the date of dissolution of Koox since it was conditioned by the person of the licensee and since the consent of the licensor was not sought. As a consequence, the agreement was not transferred to Der Grune.

Accordingly Der Grunewas not admitted to act as a licensee by the Court.

However Der Grune acquired the debts of Koox further to the dissolution and the Court held that the unpaid royalties had to be paid by Der Grune to the licensor.

This decision applies to cases of merger of companies as well as to any IP rights.

In addition it should be kept in mind that the company that is no longer a licensee has become an infringer.


Nathalie Rousset

Gevers & Ores41, avenue de FriedlandParis 75008, FranceTel: +33 1 45 00 48 48Fax: +33 1 40 67 95

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

CMS, which was told to respond to a cancellation action by February 12 but filed its response a day later, has rowed back on claims about an IT error
The deal could help Rouse gain a foothold in Australia and New Zealand for the first time
With a team of more than 80 patent lawyers and attorneys across 21 European offices, the firm is acting in some of the most high-profile UPC cases
Lippes Mathias has hired three partners and a counsel from Offit Kurman
External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
Gift this article