Scandinavia: New court structure in Sweden
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: New court structure in Sweden

The court structure in Sweden for IP matters has recently been reformed and a specialized Patent and Market Court is being established to take over all patent-related cases within the next couple of years. The new Court will handle all IP, marketing and competition law cases and is operational as of September 1 2016. The new specialised court replaces the former Court of Patent Appeals and Market Court, as well as the civil disputes in the field handled by Stockholm District Court.

The Court of Patent Appeals has previously had competence in appeals in administrative matters where the Swedish Patent and Registration Office has issued decisions, while the relevant district courts and courts of appeal have been the competent courts in infringement and cancellation matters.

Instead of having two separate ways for handling administrative and contentious matters, the new specialised IP court will deal with both infringement/cancellation matters as well as appeals on decisions from the Swedish Patent and Registration Office. Hence, the risk of parallel proceedings relating to the same dispute/right will be abolished, and the reform further has the advantage of higher specialisation in the Patent and Market Court and thereby greater predictability.

In civil proceedings (including infringements, cancellations and declarations of non-infringement) the new structure means that the Patent and Market Court will be the first instance court, the Patent and Market Appeal Court is the second instance and a possibility to appeal to the Supreme Court is retained. The new Patent and Market Court is part of the Stockholm District Court. The Patent and Market Appeal Court is part of the Svea Court of Appeal, which is located in Stockholm.

The hierarchy in administrative matters would be the same except for a further instance which will be the Patent and Registration Office dealing with applications, oppositions etc, and from where appeals may be filed to the Patent and Market Court, followed by the Patent and Market Appeal Court and finally the Supreme Court.

Leave to appeal may be granted by the Patent and Market Appeal Court for cases from the Patent and Market Court. With regard to appeals of decisions or judgments from the Patent and Market Appeal Court to the Supreme Court, it is first required that the Patent and Market Appeal Court allows the appeal to be tried by the Supreme Court and this would only be possible if there is a precedential interest for a review by the Supreme Court.

In addition to the approval by the Patent and Market Appeal Court, the Supreme Court must grant its leave to appeal in order for the decision/judgment to be tried by that court. Should either of the courts decide not to grant a leave to appeal, the decision from the lower court cannot not be appealed, and the judgment or decision from the lower court becomes final.

Administrative matters pending in the Patent Court of Appeals on September 1 2016 are transferred to the Patent and Market Court, since the former court ceased to exist on this date. With regard to already pending civil cases in district courts or appellate courts, these will not be transferred to the new courts but will be adjudicated according to the old structure.


Claes Agnvall

Malin Thunberg McCann

ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sources debate the implications of an opinion by Delaware’s chief judge Colm Connolly that lambasted the NPE IP Edge
Five partners reveal how delays in examining trademark applications are affecting their advice to clients and how they pitch new work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Partners at Quinn Emanuel explain how walkie-talkie and real-estate analogies helped them win over a jury at the Eastern District of Texas
The heads of Malaysian firm HHQ’s new technology practice group say they can be frontline advisers on the intersection between AI, blockchain, and IP
Darren Jiron, Finnegan’s managing partner in London, discusses the firm’s growth plans and misconceptions about US firm culture
The EMEA region research cycle has commenced - do not miss this opportunity to nominate your work from 2023!
A former partner at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, which voted to dissolve in October, has joined McCarter & English
As ChatGPT celebrates its first birthday, we are still grappling with a multitude of IP concerns
Sources say an official role at an IP industry body is great for generating business leads, but that shouldn’t be the only motivation behind taking on the responsibility