Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Joint ownership of trade mark rights

Nowadays, it is common for two or more companies to collaborate in developing certain projects for their common benefit. With the increasing number of companies entering into collaborative innovation, there is more joint ownership of intellectual property in Indonesia. Joint ownership of IP rights often occurs when two or more parties collaborate on a certain project. Each party in the project will then own a certain portion of the work product. The prevailing laws in Indonesia provide no specific guideline with regard to joint ownership of IP rights. Therefore, unless agreed otherwise, each joint owner will own an equal portion of the jointly owned IP rights.

While the prevailing laws allow joint ownership of intellectual property, there are some risks. Any action taken with regard to jointly owned IP rights, such as giving a licence to a third party, taking action against unauthorised use, and disposal of the IP rights, requires a joint decision by all owners.

The Trade Mark Law does not allow ownership of similar trade marks in the names of different parties. If a trade mark application/registration is jointly owned by two or more parties, each co-owner will be considered as a different party from the joint owners. Therefore, any prior trade mark application/registration owned by the joint owners will likely be cited against similar new trade marks which are filed by each individual owner. Similarly, if each individual owner has a prior trade mark application/registration, any subsequent trade mark application in the name of the joint owners which incorporates a similar element to the prior trade mark application/registration will likely be rejected due to its similarities with the prior trade mark application/registration. As letters of consent and co-existence agreements are not acceptable to overcome citation during the trade mark examination process, the subsequent trade mark application is not likely to be granted registration.

Given the above, it is advisable to avoid jointly owned IP rights. In the case of trade marks, you may choose not to obtain registration of a trade mark in the name of the joint owners which incorporates the house mark of each individual owner. Should the parties opt to own the IP rights jointly, to avoid any conflict, it is essential to make written arrangements in relation to ownership of IP rights before commencement of any work. As an alternative to joint ownership of IP rights, an arrangement which may be considered is that one party owns all the IP rights and grants a licence to the other party/ies. Compliance with the newly regulated IP rights licensing recordal must also be considered to validate the use of such rights.



Gayatri Putri

Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & PartnersThe Indonesia Stock Exchange Building, Tower II, 21st FloorSudirman Central Business DistrictJl. Jendral Sudirman Kav 52-53Jakarta 12190, IndonesiaTel: +62 21 2960 8888Fax: +62 21 2960

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Business is quiet so far but the UPC has everything it needs to attract patentees, panellists at Managing IP’s IP & Innovation Summit argued yesterday, June 7
Reviewing the list of automatically qualifying degrees every three years is a great idea and should bring more tech-savvy people to the bar
A Foss Patents blog post revealed that Mr Justice Marcus Smith handed down his judgment in Optis v Apple on May 10
Witnesses during a committee hearing criticised proposals to increase some fees by as much as 400%
Sources say they are likely to hire external counsel that can create a lasting first impression but might turn their backs on lawyers who have nothing new to offer
Varuni Paranavitane, of counsel at Finnegan, examines recent decisions by US and UK courts to demonstrate the proof of infringement that was required
The Federal Circuit will also narrow its investigation into Judge Newman to focus on whether her failure to cooperate constitutes misconduct
The management board will send three names to the Council of the EU for a final decision
Sources say a decision by the IP High Court will make it easier for rights owners to fight infringement
Seán Kelly asked the European Commission how it intends to ensure the EUIPO executive director vote, due tomorrow, will be fair and transparent