IP in Asia 2016: the key takeaways
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IP in Asia 2016: the key takeaways

Managing IP hosted our annual IP in Asia Forum in Paris and London, with sessions on China, Japan and South Korea. Here's a summary of the discussions

China

  • The event in London opened with a lively presentation on trade marks in China, including the 2013 revision to the Trademark Act and recent cases. Guan Tang of QMU discussed some of these, in the context of IP and public policy (see her book, Copyright and the Public Interest in China for more details).

  • Among the cases discussed were the controversial Bai-Lun v Xin-Bai-Lun (New Balance) case; note that the second instance decision in this is expected in the next month or so.

  • Speakers from law firm Beijing Sanyou emphasised the importance of sub-classes in China, as well as transliteration and the need to plan your trade mark strategy as early as possible.

  • We were reminded of the scale of IP litigation in China, in a panel run by law firm CCPIT, but also by problems in obtaining large damages awards. There was a warning that counterfeiters are getting smarter, requiring IP owners to work closely with police and other authorities, as well as through education and lobbying: "Patience, perseverance and budget" are key.

  • Representatives of Tyco and Vodafone brought an in-house perspective to the enforcement discussions, and echoed the need to use all available tools - particularly online. It was slightly alarming to hear about the volume of counterfeit fire-system sprinklers coming from China. 

  • In patents, the clear trend in China is that domestic companies are soaring ahead of foreign competitors in terms of the volume of applications, as speakers from Liu Shen illustrated. 

  • They added that the next (fourth) amendment to the Patent Law is expected next year. This may address concerns over both damages (notably punitive damages) and evidence (in particular preservation orders).

  • We had a wide-ranging discussion about crowdsourcing and crowd innovation in a panel led by Sean Cummings of Keltie and featuring Edmont Rao of WTOIP. 

  • In the day's final session, Jamie Rowlands of Gowling WLG and Haibin Xue, general counsel of Hexagon, gave a practical and informative overview of dealing with infringement, and particularly the options for arbitration and mediation in China.

Japan



  • Representatives of Seiwa Patent & Law reviewed recent patent and trade mark developments in Japan. 

  • In patents, two key developments are the recently resurrected opposition system, and a new decision on the doctrine of equivalents (Chugai v TKST Japan) from March this year. 

  • In trade marks, developments since the expansion of non-traditional marks in May last year were reviewed, notably cases involving sound marks and position marks, and the amended guidelines on acquired distinctiveness in April this year.

South Korea

  • Some important changes introduced in 2015 are particularly beneficial for foreign applicants, as attorneys from FirstLaw explained. These include the possibility to obtain a filing date with an English-language description. 

  • Further changes come into effect on June 30, including regarding the refund of official fees when an appeal is withdrawn or dismissed.

  • In litigation, the 2014 case on indirect infringement (involving Nokia) was discussed, and it was noted that there is an appeal pending at the Supreme Court in the entecavir patent case. 

  • An interesting and probably welcome development at the Seoul District Court (the busiest forum for IP cases) is that the judges' tenure is being increased.

The day concluded with a reception and dinner for speakers and sponsors at the Winston Churchill Room in London's Savoy Hotel.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rob Stien, chief communications and public policy officer at InterDigital, says the EU has forgotten innovators while trying to resolve an issue that doesn’t exist
As Australia’s Qantm IP leans towards being acquired by a private equity company, sources discuss what it could mean for IP firms
Law firms that are conscious of their role in society are more likely to win work, according to a survey of over 23,000 in-house professionals
Pham Nghiem Xuan Bac, managing partner of Vision & Associates, discusses opportunities created by the US-China rift as well as profitability issues facing IP practices
Douglas Leite and two of his colleagues were intrigued by Bhering Advogados’s mission to grow its patent litigation practice
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP practitioner about their life and career
Counsel explain how pricing flexibility, patent agents and being business partners can help them maintain profitable patent prosecution practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Speakers at an INTA event weighed in on why firms should create AI use policies and how they stay on top of the latest developments
The England and Wales Court of Appeal backed Lidl in its trademark dispute with Tesco, but we should pay more attention to how we rule on first-instance decisions
Gift this article