Scandinavia: A patent perspective on the Internet of Things
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: A patent perspective on the Internet of Things

The Internet of Things (IoT) is gaining in momentum and the expected growth is paramount both in terms of the number of connected devices and regarding the size of the potential business.

Wireless technologies enabling IoT have been driven by the telecoms industry. Scandinavia has a long tradition of driving the development of telecoms, and we now see more and more Scandinavian companies taking steps towards IoT products and services.

The next generation of wireless mobile technology, 5G, is designed for IoT with requirements for low device power consumption, low latency and more capacity. The technology providers in the telecom industry behind the development of 5G have a strong position in patents. Companies such as Ericsson and Qualcomm have strong portfolios of standard essential patents (SEP) for 5G.

What we see happening now is that the telecoms industry is leaving the conventional customer-phone-operator paradigm and moving into any existing traditional business with a focus on IoT.

In one way this marriage may bring the tradition of actively utilising patents, such as in the telecom industry today, along with other patent traditions in other industries.

So, how does this affect a player that wants to enter the IoT scene? The standard wireless technologies are fairly easily accessible as long as you pay a patent licence fee to the standard owner. Ericsson has for example announced that it is establishing an industry patent licensing platform for IoT. However, the IoT applications and services utilizing the wireless standards may not be covered by the standards and might thus be protected by patents either by you or a competitor.

An opportunistic view is that IoT will bring not only new product offerings but also the possibility of getting the upper hand in patents compared to your competitors. Also if you are a new player or want to take a piece of someone's existing business, IoT patents may be a way of putting you in a good bargaining position relative to the current players.

A risk worth being aware of is whether there are already players in your business that have patent rights to the IoT products you are aiming for.

We have not yet seen whether the telecom industry will influence other industries and businesses with its patent tradition, but it is expected that patents will continue to play an important role in the telecom industry that is now moving into IoT.

Wassingbo

Tomas Wässingbo


ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80 80contact@zacco.comwww.zacco.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Counsel say they’re advising clients to keep a close eye on confidentiality agreements after the FTC voted to ban non-competes
Data from Managing IP+’s Talent Tracker shows US firms making major swoops for IP teams, while South Korea has also been a buoyant market
The finalists for the 13th annual awards have been announced
Counsel reveal how a proposal to create separate briefings for discretionary denials at the USPTO could affect their PTAB strategies
The UK Supreme Court rejected the firm’s appeal against an earlier ruling because it did not raise an arguable point of law
Gift this article