Mexico: Advantages of the new trade mark opposition system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Advantages of the new trade mark opposition system

On June 1 2016, the proposed amendment to the Mexican Industrial Property Law (IPL) was published in the Federal Government Gazette, containing several modifications relating to the inclusion of provisions on opposition rights to third parties within trade mark application procedures before the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI).

These dispositions will be binding 90 natural days after publication; that is to say, this new system comes into effect as of August 30 2016.

How will it develop? All new applications will be published for opposition purposes within the next 10 working days of the filing date to allow any third party who deems that a published application falls within the absolute or relative grounds of refusal stipulated in Articles 4 and 90 of the IP Law to submit a brief of opposition, within a non-extendable one-month term from the publication date.

The first advantage of the implementation of this new opposition system is the possibility of a third party with a legal interest to demonstrate through legal arguments accompanied by documentation why the trade mark application at stake should not be granted.

Afterwards, once the one month term for opposition expires, IMPI will publish within the next 10 working days all oppositions filed, and all owners of opposed applications will have a one-month term to sustain arguments against the grounds of opposition.

This system will not suspend the official examination that IMPI normally conducts, and it will be optional to IMPI to consider or not the opposition arguments.

The above, concludes in the second advantage of the opposition system, which is the fact that IMPI will have a third filter that will culminate in the granting of more solid trade mark rights. Even though IMPI has both a formalities and registrability examination prior to the grant of a trade mark, the opposition will improve the way IMPI sometimes overlooks the existence of prior senior trade marks.

This procedure is designed to be simple, quick and less expensive than an invalidation procedure before IMPI or the federal courts. This system will certainly aid IMPI to obtain more relevant information on each new application.

Romero

Marìa Romero


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AIPPI has pulled the plug on its planned 2027 World Congress, and INTA has seemingly committed to hosting a meeting there, but the concerns won’t abate
Despite being outspent by a wealthy opponent, a trial attorney at King & Spalding says ‘relentless pursuit of the truth’ helped his team secure a $420m damages award for mobile gaming client
190 drugs face loss of exclusivity between 2026 and 2030, with the list including Bristol Myers Squibb’s blood-thinning drug Eliquis and immunotherapy medication Opdivo
Nokia, represented by a team from Bird & Bird, adjudged to have made fair offer to Asus and Acer in UK SEP dispute
Azhar Sadique and Kane Ridley, who founded the London office in 2023, are now both working in legal tech and AI-related roles, while another UK-based lawyer has also left
Partner Pierre Pérot rejoins the firm he left in 2022 alongside another returning lawyer, associate Camille Abba
Vaping dispute, in which Stobbs and Brandsmiths are the representatives, tested how the UK's Human Rights Act can apply to injunctions restraining unjustified threats
An AI platform being sold for £40m, and lateral hires involving law firms Womble Bond Dickinson and Cadwell Thomas were among the top talking points
With the London Annual Meeting behind us, we look back at some of the lessons learned this week and ahead to what 2027 will bring
In-house counsel aren’t impressed with law firms’ international networks, but practitioners say they are crucial for business
Gift this article