Mexico: Advantages of the new trade mark opposition system
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Advantages of the new trade mark opposition system

On June 1 2016, the proposed amendment to the Mexican Industrial Property Law (IPL) was published in the Federal Government Gazette, containing several modifications relating to the inclusion of provisions on opposition rights to third parties within trade mark application procedures before the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI).

These dispositions will be binding 90 natural days after publication; that is to say, this new system comes into effect as of August 30 2016.

How will it develop? All new applications will be published for opposition purposes within the next 10 working days of the filing date to allow any third party who deems that a published application falls within the absolute or relative grounds of refusal stipulated in Articles 4 and 90 of the IP Law to submit a brief of opposition, within a non-extendable one-month term from the publication date.

The first advantage of the implementation of this new opposition system is the possibility of a third party with a legal interest to demonstrate through legal arguments accompanied by documentation why the trade mark application at stake should not be granted.

Afterwards, once the one month term for opposition expires, IMPI will publish within the next 10 working days all oppositions filed, and all owners of opposed applications will have a one-month term to sustain arguments against the grounds of opposition.

This system will not suspend the official examination that IMPI normally conducts, and it will be optional to IMPI to consider or not the opposition arguments.

The above, concludes in the second advantage of the opposition system, which is the fact that IMPI will have a third filter that will culminate in the granting of more solid trade mark rights. Even though IMPI has both a formalities and registrability examination prior to the grant of a trade mark, the opposition will improve the way IMPI sometimes overlooks the existence of prior senior trade marks.

This procedure is designed to be simple, quick and less expensive than an invalidation procedure before IMPI or the federal courts. This system will certainly aid IMPI to obtain more relevant information on each new application.


Marìa Romero

OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In-house lawyers reveal how they balance cost, quality, and other criteria to get the most from their relationships with external counsel
Dario Pietrantonio of Robic discusses growth opportunities for the firm and shares insights from his journey to managing director
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
A team of IP and media law specialists has joined from SKW Schwarz alongside a former counsel at Sky
Gift this article