Last call for comments on TTAB rule changes
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Last call for comments on TTAB rule changes

Gerard Rogers, Chief Administrative Trademark Judge at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, gave an update on the Board’s proposed rule changes yesterday during the USPTO Users’ Meeting.

Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (which was published in April) are due June 3. Rogers said there were many reasons for considering the first rule changes to the TTAB since 2007, including case law, federal rule changes and technological advantages.

“The decision last year by the Supreme Court in B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries has become involved in the conversation since our Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,” noted Rogers. “But I can assure you it was neither a reason for proposing it nor is it a reason for not proposing it. I know some of the comments we have received said maybe we shouldn’t be involved in this rulemaking after the Supreme Court ruling. We don’t see it that way. It was in the works already.”

One of the biggest focuses of the rule changes is to make the TTAB filing completely electronic. “If the system is down, you can still file on paper but it needs a petition to the Director attached,” said Rogers. “So the lesson there is to file early, and that way you won’t run up against such issues.” Rogers urged any registrants that want to comment on the notice to act fast. “What will ultimately be in the Notice of Final Rulemaking may change some so if you do want to comment you have got a week and a half,” he said. The final rules package is expected to be published in September.

The USPTO is scheduled to issue a report reviewing the comments received on June 24. That day is also the effective date of the Board’s new Standard Protective Order. It will apply to all pending cases with some limited exceptions.  Mary Boney Denison, Commissioner for Trademarks at the USPTO also gave an update on several initiatives, including updating all the Office’s computer systems, TM5, a new online payment tool, outreach, the IP attaché program and the fees proposal. On the latter point, Denison said the USPTO is “trying to drive behavior away from paper” and that there should be a proposal in the Federal Register next month. She noted that about 84% of filing is done ­electronically now. Denison reported that filing this year is up 8% to 9%. “We are expecting filings to keep going,” she said.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In-house counsel explain how they develop or maintain 'IP-aware' cultures at their companies and how private practice lawyers can help
Josh Budwin, principal at the firm, said the case was one of the most complex technology disputes he's ever worked on
For the latest article in our regular series covering UPC developments, we summarise five rulings and highlight what’s expected later this month
John Keville, partner at Sheppard Mullin, explains how he secured a patent subject matter eligibility victory for his client against GoPro
An IP partner at Womble Bond Dickinson explains how its combination with Lewis Roca will create a fully-rounded litigation and prosecution service
Ronen Speyer of Evalueserve explains why in a competitive business landscape, IP has become a key driver in gaining a competitive advantage
Michael Sharp, who moved to Canadian firm Field Law from Aurora Cannabis in June, said he is enjoying cross-practice collaboration at his new firm
Yasemin Kenaroğlu tells us about setting up ‘IP School’, Turkish coffee, and why IP is like an iceberg
Irena Royzman, who joined Orrick earlier this year, explains how she's collaborated with her new colleagues to address IP policy concerns
Partners at Fenwick explain why they had to be aggressive when helping Lashify win a patent infringement trial
Gift this article