Last call for comments on TTAB rule changes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Last call for comments on TTAB rule changes

Gerard Rogers, Chief Administrative Trademark Judge at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, gave an update on the Board’s proposed rule changes yesterday during the USPTO Users’ Meeting.

Comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (which was published in April) are due June 3. Rogers said there were many reasons for considering the first rule changes to the TTAB since 2007, including case law, federal rule changes and technological advantages.

“The decision last year by the Supreme Court in B&B Hardware v. Hargis Industries has become involved in the conversation since our Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,” noted Rogers. “But I can assure you it was neither a reason for proposing it nor is it a reason for not proposing it. I know some of the comments we have received said maybe we shouldn’t be involved in this rulemaking after the Supreme Court ruling. We don’t see it that way. It was in the works already.”

One of the biggest focuses of the rule changes is to make the TTAB filing completely electronic. “If the system is down, you can still file on paper but it needs a petition to the Director attached,” said Rogers. “So the lesson there is to file early, and that way you won’t run up against such issues.” Rogers urged any registrants that want to comment on the notice to act fast. “What will ultimately be in the Notice of Final Rulemaking may change some so if you do want to comment you have got a week and a half,” he said. The final rules package is expected to be published in September.

The USPTO is scheduled to issue a report reviewing the comments received on June 24. That day is also the effective date of the Board’s new Standard Protective Order. It will apply to all pending cases with some limited exceptions.  Mary Boney Denison, Commissioner for Trademarks at the USPTO also gave an update on several initiatives, including updating all the Office’s computer systems, TM5, a new online payment tool, outreach, the IP attaché program and the fees proposal. On the latter point, Denison said the USPTO is “trying to drive behavior away from paper” and that there should be a proposal in the Federal Register next month. She noted that about 84% of filing is done ­electronically now. Denison reported that filing this year is up 8% to 9%. “We are expecting filings to keep going,” she said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
News of a new addition to Via LA’s Qi wireless charging patent pool, and potential fee increases at the UKIPO were also among the top talking points
The keenly awaited ruling should act as a ‘call to arms’ for a much-needed evolution of UK copyright law, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Gift this article