Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Under the previous rules applicable regarding registrability of a trade mark in Greece, a consent letter could admissibly be filed only before the Trade Marks Administrative Commission, not at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts, following the rejection of the trade mark application concerned, provided that (1) the trade marks under comparison are not identical, (2) the consent at issue is not contrary to the public interest and (3) there is no serious danger of the average consumer being deceived.

The good news is that under the rules now applicable (as of April 11 2012) consent letters may now be filed and unconditionally accepted even at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts. This is equally applicable to all trade mark applications regardless their filing date, that is before or after the new rules came into force.

End of the story? Not yet. There is a line of case law, which although not prevailing, favours the view that as regards trade mark applications (either national applications or IRs designating Greece) filed before April 11 2012, consent letters may be admissibly filed before the administrative courts, which will nevertheless take them into consideration in light of conditions (1) to (3) mentioned above. This in practice means that even if a consent letter is filed, the trade mark application may still be found not registrable on these grounds.

There are so far four judgments of the Administrative Court of Appeals favouring the unconditional acceptance of consent letters and two favouring the above-mentioned stiff approach. This definitely means that the issue will sooner or later be litigated before the Council of the State (the Greek Administrative Supreme Court).

Until then, the story is not finished and it seems that trade mark applicants should be prepared for a hard battle.

Manolis Metaxakis


Patrinos & Kilimiris7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.GR-11528 AthensGreeceTel: +30210 7222906, 7222050Fax: +30210 7222889info@patrinoskilimiris.comwww.patrinoskilimiris.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article