Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece: It’s (almost) never too late for a consent letter

Under the previous rules applicable regarding registrability of a trade mark in Greece, a consent letter could admissibly be filed only before the Trade Marks Administrative Commission, not at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts, following the rejection of the trade mark application concerned, provided that (1) the trade marks under comparison are not identical, (2) the consent at issue is not contrary to the public interest and (3) there is no serious danger of the average consumer being deceived.

The good news is that under the rules now applicable (as of April 11 2012) consent letters may now be filed and unconditionally accepted even at a later stage, such as pending an appeal before the administrative courts. This is equally applicable to all trade mark applications regardless their filing date, that is before or after the new rules came into force.

End of the story? Not yet. There is a line of case law, which although not prevailing, favours the view that as regards trade mark applications (either national applications or IRs designating Greece) filed before April 11 2012, consent letters may be admissibly filed before the administrative courts, which will nevertheless take them into consideration in light of conditions (1) to (3) mentioned above. This in practice means that even if a consent letter is filed, the trade mark application may still be found not registrable on these grounds.

There are so far four judgments of the Administrative Court of Appeals favouring the unconditional acceptance of consent letters and two favouring the above-mentioned stiff approach. This definitely means that the issue will sooner or later be litigated before the Council of the State (the Greek Administrative Supreme Court).

Until then, the story is not finished and it seems that trade mark applicants should be prepared for a hard battle.

Manolis Metaxakis


Patrinos & Kilimiris7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.GR-11528 AthensGreeceTel: +30210 7222906, 7222050Fax: +30210 7222889info@patrinoskilimiris.comwww.patrinoskilimiris.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article