Philippines: Employer owns copyright

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Philippines: Employer owns copyright

In 2012, Michael Dewayne Brown, an American citizen, sued for copyright infringement American English Skills Development Center (AESDCI) and its shareholders Armilyn MorilloBujis, et al, for their unauthorised copying, use, reproduction and obtaining copyright registration in the name of AESDCI, of his work "Conversational English Study Guide (First Edition)", of which Brown claimed to be the creator and author.

The action was filed before the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA) of the Intellectual Property Office (IPPHL) and was docketed as IPV No 10201200004. From the records of the case, it appeared that AESDCI was formed by Brown who invited the respondents to join him, without making any monetary investments, as Brown claimed. During the trial, the following facts were established by documentary and testimonial evidences: (i) Brown prepared Conversational English Study (the work), (ii) in many versions of the work, the words "Copyright@AESDCI" appeared, and Brown admitted having placed these words on the work himself, (iii) in 2006, upon establishment of AESDCI, Brown had a fixedterm contract with AESDCI appointing him as contract director, and when this contract expired, a consultancy agreement was entered into by Brown with AESDCI appointing him as instructor with a description of his work.

In this consultancy agreement, part of his duties and responsibilities was to "develop Training Policies and Procedures Manual...." and "develop and write Training Manuals, English Educational Materials and Lesson Plans".

The BLA Hearing Officer opined that while Brown's contract is denominated as a consultancy agreement, the description of his duties, in addition to the contract being on an exclusive basis, falls within the duties of a regular employee. As a regular employee who originally prepared the manual Conversational English Study Guide, and in the absence of an agreement identifying Brown as owner of the copyright, it is the respondent employer AESDCI who truly owns the copyright, as ruled by the Hearing Officer quoting Section 178.3 of the IP Code of the Philippines:

In the case of work created by an author during and in the course ofHis employment, the copyright shall belong to:

(b) The employer, if the work is the result of the performance of his regularly assigned duties, unless there is an agreement express or implied to the contrary.

Hechanova_Editha-100

Editha R Hechanova


Hechanova & Co., Inc.Ground Floor, Salustiana D. Ty Tower104 Paseo de Roxas Ave, Makati City 1229PhilippinesTel: +632 888 4293Fax: +632 888 4290

editharh@hechanova.com.phwww.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
The government’s keenly awaited view on AI and copyright has positive themes but leaves rights owners wanting, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
While IP Australia’s updated manual could be favourable to computer-implemented inventions, stakeholders would like to see whether a consistent and reliable standard is followed during actual examination
UKIPO will remain a competitive option as long as efficient service continues
A future opt-out has not been ruled out, but practitioners warn that the UK could fall behind in the AI race
US patent lawyers say they are increasingly advising clients on China strategies as corporations seek to gain leverage in enforcement, licensing, and supply chain management
Mike Rueckheim reunites with 12 of his former Winston & Strawn colleagues as King & Spalding continues aggressive hiring streak
As global commerce continues to expand through e-commerce platforms and digital marketplaces, protecting brands has become a growing challenge for organisations worldwide. Counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and online brand abuse are increasing across industries, making brand protection strategies a critical priority for businesses.
Henrik Holzapfel and Chuck Larsen of McDermott Will & Schulte explain why a Court of Appeal ruling could promote access to justice and present a growth opportunity for litigation finance
A co-partner in charge says the UK prosecution teams are a ‘vital’ part of the firm’s offering, while praising a key injunction win
Gift this article