Philippines: Employer owns copyright

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Philippines: Employer owns copyright

In 2012, Michael Dewayne Brown, an American citizen, sued for copyright infringement American English Skills Development Center (AESDCI) and its shareholders Armilyn MorilloBujis, et al, for their unauthorised copying, use, reproduction and obtaining copyright registration in the name of AESDCI, of his work "Conversational English Study Guide (First Edition)", of which Brown claimed to be the creator and author.

The action was filed before the Bureau of Legal Affairs (BLA) of the Intellectual Property Office (IPPHL) and was docketed as IPV No 10201200004. From the records of the case, it appeared that AESDCI was formed by Brown who invited the respondents to join him, without making any monetary investments, as Brown claimed. During the trial, the following facts were established by documentary and testimonial evidences: (i) Brown prepared Conversational English Study (the work), (ii) in many versions of the work, the words "Copyright@AESDCI" appeared, and Brown admitted having placed these words on the work himself, (iii) in 2006, upon establishment of AESDCI, Brown had a fixedterm contract with AESDCI appointing him as contract director, and when this contract expired, a consultancy agreement was entered into by Brown with AESDCI appointing him as instructor with a description of his work.

In this consultancy agreement, part of his duties and responsibilities was to "develop Training Policies and Procedures Manual...." and "develop and write Training Manuals, English Educational Materials and Lesson Plans".

The BLA Hearing Officer opined that while Brown's contract is denominated as a consultancy agreement, the description of his duties, in addition to the contract being on an exclusive basis, falls within the duties of a regular employee. As a regular employee who originally prepared the manual Conversational English Study Guide, and in the absence of an agreement identifying Brown as owner of the copyright, it is the respondent employer AESDCI who truly owns the copyright, as ruled by the Hearing Officer quoting Section 178.3 of the IP Code of the Philippines:

In the case of work created by an author during and in the course ofHis employment, the copyright shall belong to:

(b) The employer, if the work is the result of the performance of his regularly assigned duties, unless there is an agreement express or implied to the contrary.

Hechanova_Editha-100

Editha R Hechanova


Hechanova & Co., Inc.Ground Floor, Salustiana D. Ty Tower104 Paseo de Roxas Ave, Makati City 1229PhilippinesTel: +632 888 4293Fax: +632 888 4290

editharh@hechanova.com.phwww.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article