Seven takeaways from the Luxury Brands & Retail Forum
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Seven takeaways from the Luxury Brands & Retail Forum

The room in Le Meridien Piccadilly in London was packed last week for Managing IP’s first Luxury Brand & Retail Forum. James Nurton shares a few highlights from the presentations

What is a luxury brand?

Luxury Kit Kat

Speakers were nor afraid of asking the big questions. Duncan Hinnells of Aston Martin kicked off the day with an attempt to define luxury. Noting that luxury brands have blossomed despite the global downturn, he noted the importance of authenticity, consistency, personal interaction and the experiential nature, but also highlighted the trend towards more dialogue with consumers, and less paternalism and the tensions between popularity and exclusivity and between online and physical – all topics that came up later in the day in discussions about social media and new technologies. Kevin Mutch of Faberge picked up the theme in his presentation, asking the audience what luxury meant to them, and noting how there are different perceptions among different groups.

A bag full of clubs

Luxury Yieldify

Design rights attracted a lot of interest among both speakers and audience. Amarjit Purewal of Marks & Spencer talked about having an “armoury of IP rights” including different trade marks, designs and unregistered rights protecting each product. “You want to have various golf clubs in your bag,” he added. Sally Britton of Mishcon de Reya, who discussed the recent Kit Kat decision from the CJEU (pictured above right), compared IP protection to a Venn diagram, with trade marks, copyright, registered and unregistered designs all overlapping. Emily Weal of Keltie expanded on the challenges of both protecting and clearing design rights, and showed some data suggesting that registered Community designs are “more sturdy than you might think”.

Can your brand survive contact with the public?

Alexia Willetts of Wistla and Hope Shovein of Brooks Kushman offered some useful and entertaining examples of the pitfalls that can arise when using Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and hashtags, and what role trade marks can play. Above all they noted that while it is vital to secure and control relevant handles and hashtags where possible (which may be easier than you think), ultimately dealing with these challenges “goes beyond legal”. As Willetts said: litigation is only one option, and it may be prudent to consider whether the tone of your cease-and-desist letter is appropriate before hitting “Send”. A new threat could be posed by Facebook’s newly announced “Dislike” button: how should brands react if users start “disliking” their Facebook profiles?

Virtual brands

Luxury Daniel Bennett

If social media is today’s challenge, tomorrow’s could be virtual reality. Purewal described how Marks & Spencer now has virtual rails, virtual showrooms and virtual closets, and also offers customers a virtual makeover. The bridging of bricks and clicks was another theme of the day, with Anthony Barratt of Vertu noting the two-pronged challenge it has faced from physical stores and websites in Russia – though he emphasised that it has been successful in reclaiming domain names, including one that had been registered to the Kremlin.

Keep up with the counterfeiters

“Counterfeiters are getting better at duping us,” stated Daniel Bennett of Yellow Brand Protection (right), which has handled 3 million anti-counterfeiting actions in the past few months. In particular, he emphasised how they are becoming more skilful at using online sales channels (including social media, auction sites and apps) and pitching their pricing to confuse customers. “We see a very large number of issues for luxury brands,” he added. But, he said, by taking a long-haul rather than project-based approach, it is possible to tackle online abuse – and cited examples of brands that have reduced counterfeit listings by 80% in a year. Nick Kounoupias of ACID added that luxury brands “are not special” and do not face “a unique problem” as criminals don’t distinguish between industry sectors. He encouraged brand owners to work across industries to tackle counterfeit sites and ISP liability.

Technology can be your friend

Luxury Pernod RIcard

A ray of light in the anti-counterfeiting fight was provided by Mathieu Prot of Pernod Ricard (left), who explained the success of its strategy of putting QR codes on bottles of spirits in China, along with an advertising campaign. The approach has had the double success of cutting counterfeits out of the market and building brand loyalty. “In the past we have been afraid of highlighting counterfeiting,” said Prot. “But now we are turning a threat into an opportunity and improving the consumer-brand relationship.”

Is collaboration the future?

Luxury panel

Aaron Parker and Daryl Penny of Finnegan wrapped up the day with a fascinating discussion of the boom in wearable technology, and in particular the issues raised when a luxury brand combines with a technology company (a few examples include Apple/Hermès, Tag Heuer/Google/Intel, Fossil/Intel and Guess/Martian Watches). The past few years have seen thousands of patent applications in this area, leading to a “complex patent landscape” said Parker. It’s therefore important to be aware of what your competitors, individual inventors and patent trolls are doing in this sector. So, after trade marks and designs, could patents be the next battlefield for luxury brands?

Click here for speaker, agenda and venue details of this year’s Luxury Brands & Retail Forum. Managing IP hopes to bring the Forum to other cities next year, starting with New York.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Negrão is the executive director of the EUIPO in Alicante
Mrs Justice Joanna Smith identified inconsistencies between evidence given by Stability AI’s CEO and comments he made in the media
The Chongqing First Intermediate People’s Court ruled Oppo must pay for the entire unlicensed period it used the Finnish company’s technology
Firms explain how monitoring, referrals and relationships with foreign firms helped them get more work at the TTAB
Luke Toft explains why he moved back to Fox Rothschild after working in-house at Sleep Number for five months
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
In a seminal ruling, the Beijing Internet Court said images generated by Stable Diffusion counted as original works
Boston-based John Lanza is hoping to work more with life sciences colleagues on the ‘exciting’ application of AI to drug discovery
The Delhi High Court has expressed its willingness to set global licensing terms in the Nokia-Oppo dispute, but it must deal with longstanding problems first
Some patent counsel are still encountering errors even though the USPTO has fully transitioned to the new system