Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Guest blog: Why Europe must reform its trade secrets rules

The EU is considering ways of harmonising rules to protect trade secrets across Europe. Last month the European Parliament’s Legal Affairs Committee held a public hearing on the issue. One of the speakers, Alain Berger of Alstom, explains here why he thinks better protection for trade secrets is essential for European businesses


Alstom is a high-tech company, which invests substantial amounts of money in research and development (at around €800 million each year the figure is comparable to its overall profit and its material investments). It is essential that technology companies such as Alstom are able to protect their innovation and R&D efforts, as well as their commercial and business information, using a variety of legal means. Around 70% of Alstom’s value depends on trade secrets, while the risk of trade secrets theft grows ever more serious: it is expected to double by 2017.

Trade secrets are playing an increasingly important role in protecting companies’ intellectual property, including much of the know-how that results from incremental and continuous developments in technology. These kinds of technological developments allow companies to maintain their competitive advantage and technical leadership. The incremental nature of innovation also lies at the heart of SMEs, which often lack specialised resources and finance to pursue, manage, enforce and defend more formal kinds of intellectual property rights.

It is important to clarify that trade secrets are not a suspicious business; protecting them is simply about protecting valuable know-how or business information such as lists of customers, suppliers or pricing, and having remedies available so that businesses can seek redress in cases of misapropriation. Alstom has experienced problems related to trade secrets theft at first hand. Its experiences demonstrate both that heavy industry technology is vulnerable in terms of trade secrets theft, but also – and more importantly – that companies are not able to assert their rights against the theft of know-how in Europe due to the lack of appropriate European legislation. The theft of some of Alstom’s trade secrets has resulted in financial losses running into hundreds of millions of Euros and job losses across Europe.

The risk of trade secrets misappropriation is increasing due to a number of factors. These include changes in IT technologies and practices such as permament conectivity, as well as globalised supply chains. Digital technologies allow vast amount of data to be transmitted quickly and easily across borders. The damage resulting from the theft of trade secrets and the difficulties associated with seeking redress can be as damaging for a company as infringement of registered IP rights. When valuable know-how falls into the hands of rivals, they are able to bypass not only years of R&D, but also years of experience gained in interaction with customers. As a result, they can offer much lower prices by free-riding on work done by others. In the Alstom case the competitor involved offered technology at a price 30% lower than that of the original, legitimate technology providers.

Misappropriation of trade secrets, in addition to causing financial losses and job cuts, can also stifle innovation by making businesses reluctant to enter into collaborative R&D with universities or other business players and to share information.

The Directive that the European Parliament is now considering is central to numerous businesses, not just European ones but also to those that want to collaborate with European companies, because it will provide rules and a safe environment within which to share information. That is likely to make Europe more attractive to foreign investment. It will also provide better remedies and will have a deterrent effect for those considering appropriating trade secrets. A clear, consistent, EU-wide policy will discourage trade secrets misappropriation and support competitiveness and innovation, contributing to economic growth.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Significant changes to the standard of law are unlikely, say sources, who note that some justices seemed sceptical that the parties disagreed on the legal standard
Sources say the High Court of Australia’s ruling that reputation is immaterial in trademark infringement cases could stop famous brands from muscling out smaller players
Members from both sides of the US House of Representatives wrote to USPTO director Kathi Vidal on Friday, March 24, expressing their concern about “patent thicketing.”
Charles Hoskin of Singaporean e-commerce platform Shopee, who made the jump from a luxury brand, says honest conversations and collaborations are key to combatting counterfeiting
Adam Williams speaks to Managing IP about the legacy of Brexit and why IP has sometimes got ‘lost in the noise’ at Westminster
Lawyers wish the latest manual had more details on Federal Circuit cases and that training materials for design patent examiners were online
Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP