Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Indonesia: Domain name disputes in relation to trade marks

The Indonesian Domain Name Registry (PANDI) recently established a dispute settlement forum for the country code top-level domain (ccTLD) .id. The forum is called Penyelesaian Perselisihan Nama Domain or Domain Name Dispute Resolution Forum (PPND). The purpose of PPND is to provide an alternative to District Court civil claims for dispute settlement related to the .id ccTLD.

When initiating a domain name dispute proceeding in relation to trade marks, a trade mark owner is required to demonstrate that (i) the registrant's domain name is identical and/or confusingly similar to a mark owned by the trade mark owner concerned; (ii) the registrant has no rights and/or legitimate interests in the domain name; and (iii) the domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith by the registrant. These three elements must be fulfilled for the trade mark owner to prevail.

If a dispute over the same trade mark is proceeding between the trade mark owner and the domain name registrant at the Commercial Court, this should be settled before initiating a domain name dispute proceeding, since the rights and/or legitimate interest in the domain name or the trade mark concerned must be decided first.

To initiate PPND proceedings, the trade mark owner must submit a complaint to the PPND by filing its objection, which consists of (a) the domain name in dispute; (b) details of the registrant; (c) the trade mark, including the specification of goods/services it covers, which is identical or confusingly similar to the disputed domain name; (d) the arguments of objection (maximum 3,000 words); (e) the name and details of the trade mark owner or its proxy; (f) the name and details of the registrant; (g) a statement from the trade mark owner which states that "the trade mark owner agrees that the objection in relation to the disputed domain name is addressed to the registrant (the holder of the domain name), and not to the Indonesian Domain Name Registry, the Panelists and the Registrar".

The registrant has the right to submit a response within 21 days of receiving the complaint. The PPND panel will then consider the complaint and issue a decision within 21 days of receiving the complaint and the response.

The panel's decision must be announced to the public within seven days of it being made. The panel may declare that the domain name registration is transferred, cancelled, changed, or not changed. The registrar must execute the panel's decision within 21 days after receiving the decision with respect to PANDI Guidelines on Domain Name Registration. Decisions of the PPND are not binding on courts, as the parties still have the right to bring their dispute to the District Court even if the claim is the same.


Daru Lukiantono

Primastuti Purnamasari

Hadiputranto, Hadinoto & PartnersThe Indonesia Stock Exchange Building, Tower II, 21st FloorSudirman Central Business DistrictJl. Jendral Sudirman Kav 52-53Jakarta 12190, IndonesiaTel: +62 21 2960 8888Fax: +62 21 2960

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change
A New York federal court heard oral arguments this week in a copyright case pitting publishing giants against a digital library