Zimbabwe: New IP court is a good match
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Zimbabwe: New IP court is a good match

The IP Tribunal in Zimbabwe, a specialised division of the High Court, handed down its first judgment recently in the matter of Lion Match Proprietary Limited v Lion Match Zimbabwe Limited IPT 01/16.

In this case, a very old South African company that makes matches and sells them under the trademark Lion had for many years used that trade mark in Zimbabwe. It eventually withdrew from Zimbabwe, thereby allowing its former Zimbabwean subsidiary to take over both the Zimbabwean trademark and the Zimbabwean business. After many years, however, the Zimbabwean company stopped trading, seemingly because of the tough economic conditions in that country. The company also allowed its trademark registration to lapse.

The South African company then re-entered the Zimbabwean market and when it applied to register the trademark in its name, the Zimbabwean company filed its own application. The registrar had to decide which application should prevail.

The registrar found for the Zimbabwean company, saying that its non-use had been justified by the harsh economic circumstances in that country. The court, however, reversed the decision. In the court's view it was relevant that the three-year period within which a lapsed registration can be restored had already expired. The Zimbabwean company's application had to be treated as a new one and the legal maxim "he has better title who was first in point of time" had to prevail. Therefore the South African company's application went through.

maguire.jpg

Duncan Maguire

Spoor & Fisher Jersey

Africa House, Castle Street

St Helier, Jersey JE4 9TW

Channel Islands

Tel: +44 1534 838000

Fax: +44 1534 838001

info@spoor.co.uk

www.spoor.com

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

External counsel for automotive companies explain how trends such as AI and vehicle connectivity are affecting their practices and reveal what their clients are prioritising
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The winners of the awards will be revealed at a gala dinner in New York City on April 25
Counsel debate the potential outcome of SCOTUS’s latest copyright case after justices questioned whether they should dismiss it
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP lawyer about their life and career
The small Düsseldorf firm is making a big impact in the UPC. Founding partner Christof Augenstein explains why
The court criticised Oppo’s attempts to delay proceedings and imposed a penalty, adding that the Chinese company may need to pay more if the trial isn’t concluded this year
Miguel Hernandez explains how he secured victory for baby care company Naterra in his first oral argument before the Federal Circuit
The UPC judges are wrong – restricting access to court documents, and making parties appoint a lawyer only to have a chance of seeing them, is madness
The group, which includes the Volkswagen, Seat and Audi brands, is now licensed to use SEPs owned by more than 60 patent owners
Gift this article