Africa: Uganda exercises TRIPS flexibilities for pharmaceutical products
Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX
Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Africa: Uganda exercises TRIPS flexibilities for pharmaceutical products

The Ugandan Patent Office has recently objected to the grant of patents for pharmaceutical inventions following notification of grant by the African Regional Intellectual Property Organisation (ARIPO), where Uganda is a designated state. This objection is based on the national patent law of Uganda as it relates to the flexibilities regarding the application of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) to pharmaceutical products in least developed countries (LDCs).

The Harare Protocol was adopted in 1982. As a result of this, ARIPO is empowered to grant patents on behalf of its contracting states. Currently, there are 18 contracting states that may be designated in an ARIPO patent application. When filing an ARIPO application, an applicant is required to designate the member states where protection is required. The official fees payable, as well as renewal fees (which are also paid on pending ARIPO applications) are directly linked to the number of member states designated.

A patent granted by ARIPO has, in each designated state, the same effect as a patent granted under the applicable national law. Once the ARIPO office decides to grant a patent, each designated member country is notified of the decision and has a six month period in which to notify ARIPO that the patent will have no effect in its territory due to the invention not being patentable under the provisions of the Harare Protocol, or the national law of the member country because of the nature of the invention.

According to the Harare Protocol, claims related to medical indications or use must be drafted in one or more of the prescribed formats. The protocol makes it clear that claims directed to methods of medical treatment or diagnosis performed on the human or animal body are not permissible. However, the prescribed formats do allow for the patentability of substances or compositions for use in such methods, as well as so-called Swiss-type claims.

Recently, in response to a notification of a decision to grant issued by ARIPO, the Ugandan Patent Office has indicated that patents directed to pharmaceutical inventions are excluded from patent protection and will not be granted in Uganda based on Section 8(3)(f) of the Ugandan Industrial Property Act 2014, which reads:

"8(3) The following shall not be regarded as inventions and shall be excluded from patent protection-

(f) pharmaceutical products and test data until 1st January 2016 or such other period as may be granted to Uganda or least developed countries by the Council responsible for administering the Agreement on trade related aspects of intellectual property under the World Trade Organization."

The Council of the World Trade Organization, which administers the TRIPS Agreement, has agreed that LDCs have the option to exclude pharmaceutical products from patent protection and has extended the period to exercise this exclusion until 1 January 2033.

It is clear that Uganda is exercising its right to exclude patent protection for pharmaceutical products. It is thus recommended that Uganda is not designated in an ARIPO application concerning pharmaceutical products.


Chyreene Truluck

Spoor & Fisher South Africa

11 Byls Bridge BoulevardBuilding No. 14Highveld Ext 73Centurion, Pretoria0157 South AfricaTel: +27 12 676 1272Fax: + 27 12 676

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Keith Bergelt, CEO of the Open Invention Network, explains why AI technologies were not part of an update to its cross-licensing project
Kirkland & Ellis partners explain how they secured the dismissal of a patent case in which the other side had lied under oath
Managing IP understands the association had been considering other options, including Madrid or Vienna, after concerns were raised over Dubai’s positions on various rights
Chris Marando tells Managing IP that he's excited to work on PTAB matters at Perkins Coie, which recently hired another lawyer from his former firm
To mark Pride month, Darren Smyth, cochair of IP Out, says the legal profession must not forget that some members still face exclusion and hostility
Lawyers say the opening of the Milan central division this month is likely to boost activity in Italy, which has been modest so far
Sharon Urias tells us why she still has to explain the difference between copyright and trademarks
In the latest episode, Managing IP is joined by Gwilym Roberts and Lee Davies from the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys to discuss the UPC, IP ministers, diversity and more
Lawyers at Tomkins and Bomhard IP explain how they finally secured victory over McDonald’s in long-running ‘Big Mac’ trademark dispute
Technical excellence is paramount for clients looking to hire new advisers, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 corporate counsel
Gift this article