Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

France: Designs: is the liberalisation of French spare parts market imminent?

Sponsored by


The market for certain spare parts used for motor vehicle repair may be liberalised in France.

Today, Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 13 1998 on the legal protection of designs provides a status quo for these parts, in that member states can only change their national legislation in the direction of liberalisation, i.e. a lack of protection.

In France, the protection of automative parts as designs is open to any particular part that meets the legal conditions of designs protection, for a duration of 25 years. When the condition of being original is met, the parts can then also be protected by copyright for 70 years. This large protection was confirmed by the French Supreme Court (Cass. Crim. December 2 2003 n°02-88459).

A law still under discussion has added an exception to copyright monopoly so that when the component part is disclosed, its author cannot prohibit "the reproduction, use and marketing of parts intended to restore its original appearance to a motor vehicle or trailer...". This provision would come into effect on January 1 2020.

The protection by design is also amended to exclude "acts intended to restore its original appearance to a motor vehicle or trailer... for (a) parts relating to glazing, optics and mirrors; b) or made by the suppliers who manufactured the original part". It should be noted that the market for glazing and optics parts represents 30% of the spare parts market.

The protection period would also be reduced from 25 years to 10 years, while the entry into force would be January 1 2020 for parts under a) and January 1 2021 for parts under b).

Therefore, some aftermarket parts and all parts manufactured by suppliers who manufactured the original parts would be liberalised. This could constitute as much as 80% of a new vehicle.

However, there are still some obstacles: first, the use of the molds by the suppliers, and the removal of the car manufacturer's logo on the parts, which is still trademark infringement. There is also the question of access to technical information required to enable the repair.

On the other hand, Article 110 of the Community Design regulation (EC) No 6/2002, provides that protection, as a community design does not exist for a design that is a part of a complex product used to allow the repair of this complex product in order to restore its original appearance.

This only applies to replacement parts that are identical to the original part (ECJ, December 20, 2017 joined cases C 397/16 and C 435/1).

This ruling was recently applied by the Court of Appeal of Paris, on September 11 2018 against tuning parts.


Aurélia Marie

Cabinet Beau de Loménie

158, rue de l’Université

F - 75340 Paris Cedex 07 France

Tel: +33 1 44 18 89 00

Fax: +33 1 44 18 04 23

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A Court of Appeal judge demanded respect for solicitor-judges after reprimanding a barrister for his 'unwise' words
Speeches at the UPC inauguration highlighted the gap between the unitary patent dream and the reality today
Sources with experience on both sides of the Atlantic believe hugely profitable US law firms may still take some convincing before agreeing to partner with a UK outfit
IP counsel urge the government to restrict safe harbour exceptions available to intermediaries and clear up doubts with the existing law
A New York lawyer could face sanctions after citing fake judgments generated by ChatGPT, but that doesn’t mean practitioners should shy away from AI
Klaus Grabinski told delegates at a UPC inauguration event that the proposed SEP regulation would limit access to justice
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Sukanya Sarkar shares her thoughts on this year’s annual meeting in Singapore, where debates ranged from AI opportunities to improving law firm culture
The court’s ruling is a good reminder that US parties aren’t guaranteed attorney fees just because they win, say sources
With business confidence in a shaky state, Rachel Tan and Lisa Yong of Rouse discuss how in-house IP teams can manage their trademark portfolios through uncertain times