Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Preview: An interview with Richard Arnold


UK High Court judge Mr Justice Arnold speaks about how judges can set the agenda and dealing with obfuscating counsel in an exclusive interview with Managing IP

UK High Court judge Richard Arnold says he believes judges are not only required to interpret the law but to also create new laws and precedents, in a wide-ranging interview where he talks to Managing IP about his approach to cases, how to spot a badly prepared case and his views of counsel from the bench.

Asked whether judges are merely arbiters or if they can take on the role of influencer, he says that of course judges make laws. This is done through incremental developments of common law and interpretation of statutes.

He references website-blocking cases as an example – in which internet service providers were ordered to block access to websites hosting copyright-protected content and later trademark-infringing material as well.

“It so happened that it fell onto me to pioneer and develop the remedy of website blocking in this jurisdiction,” he says, adding that he set the agenda on this remedy for IP owners by chance. “I had no notion that that was what I was going to be doing until it was brought before me,” he says. “I found myself not so much developing an area of law as creating it.”

Echoing old comments made by Lord Reid, he says: “The idea that judges don’t make laws is a fairy tale, and we don’t believe in fairy tales anymore.

Cross-border collaboration is also increasingly common, Arnold says. He notes that foreign case law – particularly judgments from the Netherlands and Germany – have been quite influential and that judgments from courts in England and Wales are also assessed overseas.

The full-length interview, in which Arnold also shares his views on what in-house counsel can do better; the judicial recruitment crisis and why he does not consider himself to be a “judicial superman”, will be published on Managing IP and Patent Strategy shortly.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Allison M Hester, attorney at Moye White, outlines Mattel's litigation history and explains what trademark lessons brands can learn from the toy company
The Portuguese won a high-profile race to succeed Christian Archambeau as executive director in July
Each week Managing IP speaks to a different IP professional about their life and career
Van Anh Le, assistant professor in IP law at Durham University, assesses the US-Vietnam partnership and the potential implications for Vietnam's IP landscape
Civil society and industry representatives met in Geneva on Thursday, September 28 to discuss a potential expansion of the TRIPS waiver
Sources say the beta version of the USPTO’s new trademark search tool is a big improvement over the current system but that it isn’t perfect
Canadian counsel weigh in on the IP office’s decision to raise trademark filing fees in 2024 and how they’re preparing clients
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Shira Perlmutter, US Register of Copyrights, discussed the Copyright Office's role in forming generative AI policy during a House of Representatives hearing
The award marks one of the highest-ever damages received by a foreign company in a trademark infringement suit in China