Russia: Chamber of Patent Disputes allows legal contraband

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Russia: Chamber of Patent Disputes allows legal contraband

Luis Caballero, a famous Spanish liquor company filed a trademark application No 2016718658 for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages except beer).

contra-bando-150.jpg

As expected, the patent office rejected the application because, as is easily understood in any language, it means illegal traffic of goods through the border. The examiner referred specifically to this fact. He reminded the applicant that unlawful transit of goods through the border violates customs regulations which is in contradiction of public interest and Russian law in general.

The applicant appealed the decision to the Chamber of Patent Disputes. He pointed out that the designation rejected by the patent office had been in wide use for quite a while in Russia. The goods are being sold in many big shops, chain stores and on the Internet. The goods are popular with buyers. Controlling bodies (customs etc.) do not have any objections to such sales, nor are there objections to the labelling of the goods.

The Chamber of Patent Disputes agreed with the arguments raised by the applicant and explained its position as follows.

It is true that the claimed designation includes word elements meaning "contraband". The designation elicits associations in the minds of consumers which are directly connected to the meaning of the word.

On the other hand, consumers understand that the claimed goods in Class 33 are necessarily subject to customs clearance when they cross the Russian border. They are subject to excise duty, and in such circumstances the designation is perceived by the consumer as something jocular and original in character. Besides, the applicant submitted documents showing that rum labelled with the claimed designation has already been on sale in the Russian Federation and has become famous as a drink characterised by a balanced taste. It has a bright, vibrant colour and bright golden tinge. As for the name used on the label of the alcoholic drink, it has interesting historical roots. The applicant produced documents supporting the choice of the name.

The name came about as a result of a notary public, Fernando Mora, who spent a holiday in the Dominican Republic. There he tasted a variety of rum and was enchanted by it. He packed several bottles of the drink in his trunk and smuggled it home to Spain. His friends also liked it. By chance, Mr Luiz Enrique Caballero Domingues, president of the old vinery, Luis Caballero, tasted it too and liked it.

He decided to buy the rum in 2012 and called it "Contrabando". The choice was clearly good because in 2013 the rum won a gold medal at Congreso Internacional del Ron.

The Chamber of Patent Disputes considered this and also took into account the fact that the claimed designation had obtained registration in the European Union (Reg. No 10606101).

Thus the Chamber of Patent Disputes concluded that registration of the claimed designation would not contradict public interest.

biriulin-vladimir.jpg

Vladimir Biriulin


Gorodissky & PartnersRussia 129010, MoscowB. Spasskaya Str25, stroenie 3Tel: +7 495 937 6116 / 6109Fax: +7 495 937 6104 / 6123pat@gorodissky.ru www.gorodissky.com 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article