Updates on the patent maintenance system in Mexico

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Updates on the patent maintenance system in Mexico

Sponsored by

olivares-400px.jpg
File Folder Labeled as Patents.

For a long time, the Mexican Industrial Property Law remained static. However, in the last years, the law has been amended, having an impact on the lifespan of design registrations. Furthermore, due to the recent international commitments of our country, a new law has been approved further modifying the patent maintenance system.

On 2018, the amendments to the law modified the length of protection for design registrations. Before the amendments, design registrations were protected for 15 years. The amendments modified this by providing a first period of protection of five years which could be renewed four times, giving a total length of protection of 25 years. The amendments also applied to pending design registration applications and registrations already granted.

The new Law for Industrial Property Protection, which will come in force in the final months of 2020 maintains the aforementioned amendments and also provides an increment in the time of protection for utility models, which has changed from a previous 10-year lifetime to a new 15-year period of protection.

Finally, the new law follows the recent international commitments made by our country, and includes the possibility of a complementary certificate which aims to adjust the time of protection of a granted patent when the Mexican Patent Office determines that there was unreasonable delay in the prosecution of the patent. The regulation for the new law is still awaiting publishing, and the details for the granting of complementary certificates is a completely new practice in our country, therefore, further details on this matter will be clarified in the following months.

In conclusion, we consider that the changes concerning the period of protection for inventions in our country are very positive and will be an advantage for our patent system and ultimately for the owners of patents in our country.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article