The number one issue for IP owners

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The number one issue for IP owners

What is the biggest challenge for IP owners entering emerging markets? This was one of the questions addressed by the UK’s IP attachés, who were visiting London recently from their bases in Brazil, China, Singapore and Switzerland

IPAN panel

Their two roles are to provide practical support to UK companies, particularly SMEs, entering new markets, and to work with host nation governments on improvements to laws and enforcement. France and the United States have similar networks of representatives.

Speaking at an event hosted by IPAN at CIPA last month (right), the UK attachés noted that they have worked with 233 individual companies, who have IP rights estimated at £377 million ($600 million).

They also spoke about some of the specific issues they have been working on. So what, I wondered is the single biggest challenge for UK rights owners in these markets? Is it counterfeiting? Copyright piracy? Problems with patentability? Cybersquatting? Compulsory licensing? The expense and time of litigation? The difficulty of finding local lawyers?

It turns out it’s more mundane. About 40% of the issues the attaches work on concern trade marks. And based on their presentations and from speaking to them afterwards, it seems like the single biggest headache is bad faith applications. As the UK attaché in Beijing Tom Duke said, one of the main unanswered questions about the revisions to China’s Trade Mark Law is: “How will they deal with the systemic problem of bad faith applications?”

Wait Rose Chennai

Some of these experiences might be unique to British institutions – both Buckingham Palace and the Royal Mint have had to take action in India – but others are typical for owners of well-known brands. One example given (also from India) was the Wait Rose supermarket set up in Chennai - the two words separated by a picture of a rose (see photo).

In some ways it seems ridiculous that more than 130 years after the Paris Convention was signed, and despite the popularity of systems such as the Madrid Protocol, trade mark owners are bedevilled by chancers exploiting their hard-earned goodwill to confuse consumers.

On the other hand, perhaps it’s an unavoidable effect of the flattening of the world. Some people might also say trade mark owners only have themselves to blame if they don’t take steps to register their rights promptly.

We’d be interested to know what readers think. Are bad faith applications a nuisance, or something worse? And can anything realistically be done to tackle them?

For more information on the UK IP attachés, read the independent report on their work so far.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Gift this article