Louboutin claims New York retailer infringed red sole trade mark

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Louboutin claims New York retailer infringed red sole trade mark

Shoemaker Christian Louboutin is once again suing for trade mark infringement over his red-soled shoe, less than nine months after his infamous suit against Yves Saint Laurent was decided

On Friday, the French designer filed a complaint with the District Court for the Southern District of New York against Alba Footwear and unidentified customers of the US retailer.

The complaint included sample photographs of two pairs of Alba shoes that, while clearly bearing the Alba logo, utilised red soles and contrasting uppers.

Louboutin made headlines after suing fashion rival YSL for infringing the red sole mark with a monochromatic red shoe. YSL counterclaimed that the mark should be invalidated, and in August 2011 District Court Judge Victor Marrero agreed, concluding that “a monopoly on the color red would impermissibly hinder competition among other participants”.

But in September last year, a panel of judges from the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit overturned the decision. The appellate court resurrected the red sole mark, but limited it to shoes featuring red soles and contrasting uppers and ruled that YSL’s all-red shoe did not infringe.

The ruling was welcomed by brand owners and industry organisations including Tiffany and INTA, both of which filed amicus briefs in support of Louboutin.

In Louboutin’s latest lawsuit, the designer claims Alba imports and sells copies of the Louboutin shoes. According to the complaint, authentic Louboutin shoes sell for up to $6400 a pair.

Louboutin is suing for trade mark infringement, counterfeiting, trade mark dilution, unfair competition and false designation of origin under the Lanham Act and New York State law.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Indian smartphone maker Lava must pay $2.3 million as a security deposit for past sales, as its dispute with Dolby over audio coding SEPs plays out
Powell Gilbert’s opening in Düsseldorf, complete with a new partner hire, continues this summer’s trend of UPC-related lateral movement
IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Gift this article