Australia may adopt fair use exceptions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australia may adopt fair use exceptions

Technological neutrality is a “highly relevant” consideration as the government looks for ways to update its copyright laws

The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) released a discussion paper “Copyright and the Digital Economy” yesterday exploring whether the exceptions and statutory licences in the Copyright Act need to be updated.

From fair dealing to fair use

One of the central proposals is to adopt a “broad” and “flexible” fair use exception that would examine each case according to four factors: the nature of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount of the work used and the impact on the market for the copyrighted material. These factors are identical to those found in most jurisdictions that recognise fair use, such as the United States.

Australian law already provides fair dealing exemptions that delineate specific exceptions from copyright infringement such as research, criticism or satire. The proposed fair use exception would be broader and based on the principles outlined in the four factors rather than specifically illustrated situations.

Keeping up with technology

One advantage of fair use touted by the ALRC is that a principles-based exception can better adapt to changing technologies. The report cites a submission from telecommunications company Telstra arguing that “the current exceptions are generally created in response to existing technologies, economies and circumstances. As a result, they tend to have a narrow ‘patchwork’ application to circumstances existing at the time the exception is introduced".

Unsurprisingly, copyright disputes turning on pre-internet legal distinctions have become increasingly common. In the Aereo case in the United States, the defendant prevailed largely because it used thousands of antennae array to record over-the-air broadcasts for users, rather than one antenna to make a single recording for multiple users. Similarly, the AFL vs Optus decision in Australia turned on whether a provider of a cloud-based digital video recording service is the maker of copies of copyrighted material, as opposed to the end users.

As a result, a number of other jurisdictions are also looking into comprehensive updates of their copyright laws, such as the Hargreaves Report in the UK. Interestingly, that report also considered adopting a US-style fair use regime, but declined to do so because of “genuine legal doubts about the viability of a US case law based legal mechanism in a European context.”

The full paper can be found here. Submissions will be accepted until July 31 at the ALRC website or at copyright@alrc.gov.au.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A ruling on confidentiality by the the England and Wales Court of Appeal and an intervention from the US government in the InterDigital v Disney litigation were also among top talking points
Moore & Van Allen hires former Teva counsel Larry Rickles to help expand the firm’s life sciences capabilities
Canadian law firms should avoid ‘tunnel vision’ as exclusive survey reveals client dissatisfaction with risk management advice and value-added services
In major recent developments, the CoA ruled on director liability for patent infringement, and Nokia targeted Paramount at the UPC and in Germany
Niri Shan, the newly appointed head of IP for UK, Ireland and the Middle East, explains why the firm’s international setup has brought UPC success, and addresses German partner departures
Vlad Stanese joins our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss potentially precedent-setting trademark and copyright cases and his love for aviation
Heath Hoglund, president of Via LA, discusses how it sets royalty rates and its plans to build on growth in China
Stobbs stands accused of interfering with the administration of justice after Brandsmiths’ client was subjected to an interim injunction for unjustified threats
The firm, known for its prosecution expertise, discusses its plans following the appointment of a UK-based patent litigation head and two new partners
Ed White at Clarivate provides an exclusive insight into the innovation power clusters reshaping Europe and the Middle East’s IP landscape, and why quality is the new currency of invention
Gift this article