YouTube responds to criticism of Content ID copyright protection system

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

YouTube responds to criticism of Content ID copyright protection system

YouTube has issued a response to critics after its new Content ID copyright protection system whipped up a storm of criticism from video developers, composers and users.

The Content ID system, which sends copyright violation notices to users based on automated scanning, has been widely criticised since its launch last week for flagging thousands of “Let’s Play” videos, many of which are not breaking copyright law.

Let’s Play videos are made by video game fans who use in-game footage to make walkthroughs, reviews and reports. Content ID was introduced in response to complaints about alleged copyright violation of in-game music featured in many of the videos. The system blocks the creator of the YouTube video from running revenue-generating ads, and allows the individual or organisation which claims to be the copyright holder to run them instead.

Some companies, including rights enforcement businesses IndMusic and TuneCore, have angered YouTube users by attempting to extract revenue from videos featuring music that does not violate copyright law, or music they have no standing to enforce the rights to.

In an interview published yesterday, IndMusic CEO Brandon Martinez told Develop magazine that he and his colleagues are not “evil trolls” and blamed composers for failing to report licensed or commissioned work so that it would not be flagged.

Some game companies consider Let’s Play videos positive marketing for their games and have issued statements approving the use of footage from their games for Let’s Play videos. One developer, Vlambeer, has created a retroactive permission form for players who want to monetise its content in this fashion.

YouTube video developers have now organised themselves into a group, WhoLetsPlay, to collect and distribute information about how individual video game companies treat fans who use in-game footage to make walkthroughs, reviews and reports.

YouTube sent out an email to users in response to the criticism, which was published on gaming site Kotaku on Tuesday.

The letter suggests Let’s Play video developers turn off in-game music and instead use free music from YouTube’s audio library to avoid being automatically flagged for copyright violation.

It reassures users that most copyright claims will not impact the standing of their account.

But it does not acknowledge claims about abuses of the system by those who claim to be rights holders or companies claiming to act on their behalf.

“Keep in mind one video may contain multiple copyrighted works, any of which could potentially result in a claim,” it said.

“Also, online rights are often resold to companies like music labels and aggregators. While you might not recognize the owner, this doesn't necessarily mean their claims are invalid.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article