US government pays $50 million settlement for pirated software

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

US government pays $50 million settlement for pirated software

The US government has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a copyright infringement suit after the Army allegedly installed software on thousands of unlicensed computers.

Apptricity, an 80-employee company that supplies the Army with logistics software, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit with the US Court of Federal Claims seeking $250 million from the government.

In 2004, the Army paid for licenses for Apptricity software for three servers at $1.35 million each, along with licenses for individual computers. In 2007 the Army purchased licenses for another two servers and thousands of workstations, along with annual maintenance.

But Apptricity claims that the Army also installed approximately 100 server and 9,000 device licenses that it did not procure. The situation came to Apptricity’s attention when the US Army Program Director publicly stated in 2009 that thousands of devices had Apptricity software.

The software tracks the movement of goods, equipment and troops in real time across multiple time zones. The Army has used it in the Middle East and to handle emergency management efforts such as the aftermath of the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti.

“Field commanders were focused on the mission-critical nature of Apptricity software and the need to protect warfighters and facilitate mission objectives,” said Apptricity CEO Tim Garcia. “Our battle-tested integrated logistics software performed so well that it went viral.”

After mediation, the parties agreed a settlement of $50 million for the present and future use of the software.

The US government is a frequent proponent of tough penalties for violators of IP rights and has run initiatives including the Joint Strategic Plan aimed at curtailing copyright infringement.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article