US government pays $50 million settlement for pirated software

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US government pays $50 million settlement for pirated software

The US government has agreed to pay $50 million to settle a copyright infringement suit after the Army allegedly installed software on thousands of unlicensed computers.

Apptricity, an 80-employee company that supplies the Army with logistics software, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit with the US Court of Federal Claims seeking $250 million from the government.

In 2004, the Army paid for licenses for Apptricity software for three servers at $1.35 million each, along with licenses for individual computers. In 2007 the Army purchased licenses for another two servers and thousands of workstations, along with annual maintenance.

But Apptricity claims that the Army also installed approximately 100 server and 9,000 device licenses that it did not procure. The situation came to Apptricity’s attention when the US Army Program Director publicly stated in 2009 that thousands of devices had Apptricity software.

The software tracks the movement of goods, equipment and troops in real time across multiple time zones. The Army has used it in the Middle East and to handle emergency management efforts such as the aftermath of the January 2010 earthquake in Haiti.

“Field commanders were focused on the mission-critical nature of Apptricity software and the need to protect warfighters and facilitate mission objectives,” said Apptricity CEO Tim Garcia. “Our battle-tested integrated logistics software performed so well that it went viral.”

After mediation, the parties agreed a settlement of $50 million for the present and future use of the software.

The US government is a frequent proponent of tough penalties for violators of IP rights and has run initiatives including the Joint Strategic Plan aimed at curtailing copyright infringement.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article