FTC seeks comments on plan to study patent trolls

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

FTC seeks comments on plan to study patent trolls

The Federal Trade Commission is seeking public comments on a plan to gather information on 25 unnamed patent assertion entities (PAEs)

The FTC hopes to gain a better understanding of how PAEs operate and how they affect innovation and competition. The investigation will be held under Section 6b of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

In a press release, the FTC said the study would “provide a more complete picture of PAE activities” than previous investigations from other sources, because the Commission has unique Congressional authority to collect non-public information such as licensing agreements, patent acquisition information and cost and revenue data.

FTC chairwoman Edith Ramirez announced plans to launch the investigation back in July as one of a series of measures by the Obama administration targeting patent trolls. That month, the ITC announced a pilot scheme to speed up the disposal of patent cases and the White House issued seven proposed legislative changes and five executive actions, to be implemented largely through the USPTO.

Comments can be submitted online or by mail to Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex J), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article