Largest ever MIP survey reveals the world’s leading patent firms

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Largest ever MIP survey reveals the world’s leading patent firms

survey2013-45.png

The patent rankings of the 2013 IP Survey have been released, with mergers, splits and hires leading to changes in the Europe and Asia tables

MIP survey 2013

Managing IP’s annual research into the leading IP firms worldwide is now into its 20th year. The patent rankings have been released in the February issue of the magazine, to be followed by trade marks in March and copyright in April.

Among the changes this year are several splits in Asia, with Ella Cheong Spruson & Ferguson ending their partnership in Singapore for example. The mergers with Australian firms have also led to some changes, with Freehills Patent Attorneys being the stand-out case – despite splitting from the litigation side of the firm, which merged with Herbert Smith, its work saw it promoted to the top tier.

In the UK law firm Powell Gilbert was promoted to tier 1, finally on a par with Bristows – the firm it split from in 2007. Withers & Rogers was promoted in patent prosecution. Meanwhile in Germany Quinn Emmanuel’s strong work for Samsung, under the new team lead by Marcus Grosch, led to it climbing the rankings for the second year in a row.

The full rankings can be seen by Managing IP subscribers here. Readers can also take a free trial to gain access for a limited period.

This was the most in-depth research Managing IP has ever undertaken, with new elements including state-by-state analysis of firms across the United States and leading practitioners recommended for the first time.

This year the researchers behind the rankings have also written features around the issues they came across, from how the prosecution industry in Europe is changing to the way big US filers distribute their work.

The trade mark rankings in the March issue will also be accompanied by three features analysing China, the mergers in Australia and new IP courts in Europe.

Managing IP’s annual rankings of leading firms are based on extensive research by a dedicated team in London, New York and Hong Kong. Researchers contact all the listed firms, as well as other practitioners and clients, to rank the leading practices in tiers, according to market perceptions.

The tables do not necessarily rank the oldest or largest firms, and are not based on filing statistics.

No results are released before publication and no firm can pay to be included.

Read the full methodology here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In other news, Australia’s IP office has announced expanded search options, and an EPO report shed light on slow progress relating to women inventors in Europe
Managing IP speaks with up-and-coming women lawyers at five law firms about fighting imposter syndrome, maintaining work-life balance and why real representation matters
Kilpatrick’s managing partner for San Francisco discusses taking the longer route to partnership, the importance of female mentors, and strengthening office culture
Home-working and grace periods at IP offices have been announced, while Managing IP understands Iran’s IP office is out of service
With INTA 2026 just two months away, London-based IP practitioners offer tips on making the most out of the city
New platform, which covers SEPs for the Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 7 standards, includes 10 patent owners
The Texas-based IP litigation hires take King & Spalding’s partner appointments from pre-merger Winston & Strawn up to 12 this year
Sunny Su explains how her team overcame challenges with orchard evidence collection to secure a favourable plant variety decision from China’s top court
Flexible working firm continues trajectory from 2025 with appointment of Matthew Grant and Letao Qin
Anousha Davies, associate and trademark attorney at Birketts, unpicks how the university’s reputation enabled it to see off a proposed trademark for ‘Cambridge Rowing’
Gift this article