Americas IP Handbook editorial: Mexican lawyers resist Madrid Protocol

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Americas IP Handbook editorial: Mexican lawyers resist Madrid Protocol

Mexican lawyers who spoke to Managing IP researchers for the 2012 IP Handbook this year said that the country’s accession to the Madrid Protocol will be a “nightmare”

Colombia this week became the first Latin American country besides Cuba to officially join the Protocol.

Lawyers there seemed ready for the change, having had years to mull it over, but some said that more traditional firms are still resisting.IP lawyers put a lot of pressure on the government not to accept the Protocol in negotiations,” said Alvaro Ramirez Bonilla of B&R Latina. “The older firms don’t want to lose money. I think it’s a valid fear. Lawyers are going to lose trade mark work.”

In the Latin America and Caribbean section of this year’s IP Handbook, which is now live, lawyers in Mexico seemed equally resistant. Mexico’s Senate recently voted to approve legislation that will allow the country to accede. “In a country like Mexico, where 80% of the filings are from foreign companies, are you benefiting your national companies at all?” asked one attorney. “If we [accede], I think it will be a nightmare for everybody. We don’t have a system that’s ready for that.”

Firm and market editorials for eight jurisdictions in the Americas are now live, including the United States and Canada.

Lawyers in the US discussed trends in alternative fee arrangements, patent reform and the changing role of IP in business. “Now, CEOs and people running these large corporations are looking at how IP fits into the business,” commented one attorney. “They’re bringing IP to the corporate boardroom.”

In Canada, this year’s survey reveals unprecedented movement among firms, and lawyers weigh in on landmark decisions such as the Canadian Patent Office’s allowance of Amazon.com’s controversial one-click patent.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Value-added services give in-house counsel the satisfaction that they are getting more value for money, while law firms get the opportunity to win more work
A team at Boies Schiller Flexner is advising shoe company Kizik and parent company HandsFree Labs in the dispute
Nokia’s latest enforcement actions against Geely and Transsion joining Via LA’s AAC pool were also among the top talking points
Benjamin Kelly, the firm’s fifth IP partner hire in a little over one year, has experience in patent and trade secret disputes involving complex technologies
Half-year Talent Tracker data shows Pierson Ferdinand was among the most prolific hirers in the US, while in Europe, there has been a notable UPC swing
Exclusive data reveals in-house counsel want external legal advisers to build better client relationships and add value beyond routine work
Brett Sandford acted for Perplexity AI, which fended off the threat of a preliminary injunction to launch an AI-powered web browser
Stephen Yang joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to explain why his role requires him to wear many hats
The complaint follows a declaratory ruling issued by the England and Wales High Court last month that said Samsung is entitled to an interim licence
Tobias Hahn explains how the firm's multi-jurisdictional setup enabled it to secure an injunction on behalf of Fujifilm relating to defendant Kodak’s non-UPC activity
Gift this article