Americas IP Handbook editorial: Mexican lawyers resist Madrid Protocol

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Americas IP Handbook editorial: Mexican lawyers resist Madrid Protocol

Mexican lawyers who spoke to Managing IP researchers for the 2012 IP Handbook this year said that the country’s accession to the Madrid Protocol will be a “nightmare”

Colombia this week became the first Latin American country besides Cuba to officially join the Protocol.

Lawyers there seemed ready for the change, having had years to mull it over, but some said that more traditional firms are still resisting.IP lawyers put a lot of pressure on the government not to accept the Protocol in negotiations,” said Alvaro Ramirez Bonilla of B&R Latina. “The older firms don’t want to lose money. I think it’s a valid fear. Lawyers are going to lose trade mark work.”

In the Latin America and Caribbean section of this year’s IP Handbook, which is now live, lawyers in Mexico seemed equally resistant. Mexico’s Senate recently voted to approve legislation that will allow the country to accede. “In a country like Mexico, where 80% of the filings are from foreign companies, are you benefiting your national companies at all?” asked one attorney. “If we [accede], I think it will be a nightmare for everybody. We don’t have a system that’s ready for that.”

Firm and market editorials for eight jurisdictions in the Americas are now live, including the United States and Canada.

Lawyers in the US discussed trends in alternative fee arrangements, patent reform and the changing role of IP in business. “Now, CEOs and people running these large corporations are looking at how IP fits into the business,” commented one attorney. “They’re bringing IP to the corporate boardroom.”

In Canada, this year’s survey reveals unprecedented movement among firms, and lawyers weigh in on landmark decisions such as the Canadian Patent Office’s allowance of Amazon.com’s controversial one-click patent.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In-house counsel explain why firms should provide risk management advice that helps them achieve their goals
Attorneys at four firms explain the AI trends they expect in the future, including a potential shift in who plaintiffs sue for copyright infringement
The dispute at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court pits Dryrobe against D-Robe and will include a ‘genericide’ element
Novo Nordisk losing patent rights covering Ozempic in Canada and a US Supreme Court decision favouring Ed Sheeran were also among the top talking points
The court will hand down its ruling in Iconix v Dream Pairs on Tuesday, June 24, in a case that concerns post-sale confusion
Developments included a stay in a row concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction and a timeline for the rollout of the long-awaited new CMS
Jorg Thomaier, who has been head of IP at the German pharma company since 2010, will leave later this year and hand the reins to the company’s head of patents
Companies must conduct thorough IP due diligence – even if it may not be mandatory
Celia Cheah at Wong & Partners in Malaysia says she is aiming to tap into the Baker McKenzie member firm’s international network and expand its IP portfolio
A team of partners that joined Boies Schiller Flexner say they would like to double the firm’s patent litigation capabilities
Gift this article