UK IPO floats ideas to promote innovation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK IPO floats ideas to promote innovation

Could embedding experienced IP owners into British companies help boost levels of IP awareness and exploitation in the country’s businesses?

That’s an option that may be proposed by the UK Intellectual Property Office’s director of innovation, Rosa Wilkinson.

In an interview with Managing IP, she explained how during her time as a civil servant with the government body UK Trade and Investment, she had rolled out a manufacturing advisory service that sent experienced manufacturers to work with companies that had asked for support for their businesses to help them analyse their situation and develop an action plan for growth.

“I can imagine this working in the IP world: looking at how IP features in a company''s strategy,” said Wilkinson. “That’s one proposal. Will businesses welcome it? I want to know what level of demand there will be. It''s rather a finger in the air at the moment.”

She added that it was wrong to assume that levels of entrepreneurialism in the UK lagged behind those in some of its closest economic rivals, saying that lost of business activity goes unrecognised.

“We have lots of third-bedroom businesses, although their tax arrangements may not show it! Levels of enterprise are pretty good. What worries me is that the people starting businesses don’t always know the threats and opportunities and how to prepare for them,” she said.

Wilkinson added that when the IPO published a report on the ways in which SMEs can be helped to protect their IP, the USPTO called soon after to talk about their findings.

One way to improve levels of understanding of IP is to ensure that the people giving new businesses advice are able to talk to them about the risks and opportunities of IP, she said.

“There''s a big gulf between no advice and expert advice. There’s not enough in the middle.”

“I want us to make better use of other people’s channels – helping other business advisory panels to up their IP offer. It''s about infecting other people’s channels ... Ultimately we want businesses to understand IP''s opportunities and potential challenges. Then they can bring applications to us that are better formed. It is better for them they don''t spend their legal budget getting basic advice about IP.”

The innovation director’s role includes overseeing the IPO’s outreach function and how it responds to requests for help from business as well as managing the Office’s research function: the Economics, Research and Evidence (ERE) team.

“Our ERE team helps us understand the value that IP adds and where things go wrong for companies,” she said. “On the policy side, having a good understanding of what works really matters.”

You can read the full interview with Rosa Wilkinson on www.Managingip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Natasha Ahmed said she was drawn to the firm’s commitment to artificial intelligence and tech transactions
As it celebrates its 50th anniversary this year, the firm discusses private equity interest in IP, why the UPC is a key priority, and being a ‘strategic adviser’ to clients
Thomas Rukin discusses IP due diligence, his joy at seeing colleagues succeed, and taking inspiration from Marcus Aurelius
The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Gift this article