Austria: The difficulties of establishing two trade marks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: The difficulties of establishing two trade marks

Sponsored by

sonn-400px.png

During the time of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, a famous hotel existed in Vienna. Its name was Meissl & Schadn and its restaurant was very well-known for its high-end beef dishes.

For some decades now, a well-known chain of restaurants in Vienna that specialises in high-quality beef dishes has existed. Its name is Plachutta.

In 2000 Plachutta registered the trade mark Meissl & Schadn in class 42 for the running of restaurants and cafés. It was for use as a secondary trade mark. In brochures, menus, its cookbooks and other material it purported to continue the tradition of the old Meissl & Schadn and saw itself as its successor.

A short time ago, a new hotel opened on the prestigious Ring with a fashionable old Viennese-style restaurant called Meissl & Schadn. This restaurant also specialises in traditional, high-end Viennese cooking, using beef as the basis of many of its dishes. The existence of the trade mark Meissl & Schadn registered in the name of an established, famous competitor posed too great a danger to the new business. As a result, a cancellation action was started on the basis of non-use.

Plachutta used the trade mark Meissl & Schadn solely in print and that too only in order to point to the tradition of Viennese beef cooking. The trade mark had no specific and concrete connections to certain services which would enable consumers to distinguish these services from those of other enterprises. However, this is the essence and purpose of trademarks. Consumers were not able to distinguish the origin of certain specific services by hearing or reading the trade mark Meissl & Schadn from the same services offered by others. Consequently, a trade mark was not established. The mere use of it as a reference to an old tradition did not suffice. The trade mark Meissl & Schadn was cancelled due to non-use.

Normally, restaurant services are carried out under the name of the restaurant and this is also its trademark. The above case shows the difficulties that arise when trying to establish a second trade mark.

sonn.jpg

Helmut Sonn



SONN & PARTNER Patentanwälte

Riemergasse 14

A-1010 Vienna, Austria

Tel: +43 1 512 84 05

Fax: +43 1 512 98 05

office@sonn.at

www.sonn.at

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

In-house counsel explain why firms should provide risk management advice that helps them achieve their goals
Attorneys at four firms explain the AI trends they expect in the future, including a potential shift in who plaintiffs sue for copyright infringement
The dispute at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court pits Dryrobe against D-Robe and will include a ‘genericide’ element
Novo Nordisk losing patent rights covering Ozempic in Canada and a US Supreme Court decision favouring Ed Sheeran were also among the top talking points
The court will hand down its ruling in Iconix v Dream Pairs on Tuesday, June 24, in a case that concerns post-sale confusion
Developments included a stay in a row concerning the UPC’s jurisdiction and a timeline for the rollout of the long-awaited new CMS
Jorg Thomaier, who has been head of IP at the German pharma company since 2010, will leave later this year and hand the reins to the company’s head of patents
Companies must conduct thorough IP due diligence – even if it may not be mandatory
Celia Cheah at Wong & Partners in Malaysia says she is aiming to tap into the Baker McKenzie member firm’s international network and expand its IP portfolio
A team of partners that joined Boies Schiller Flexner say they would like to double the firm’s patent litigation capabilities
Gift this article