Spain: IP infringement in spirits and wine

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: IP infringement in spirits and wine

The European Observatory on infringement on Intellectual Property Rights has made a report in relation to the economic cost of infringements in spirits and wine in the European Union; this report aims to evaluate the consequences of counterfeiting in a concrete field, comparing the sales forecast and the actual sales.

In this case, the Observatory only refers to manufacturing companies; it does not include wholesale and retail trade.

As an introduction, and focusing primarily on Spain, it is, with €6 billion (annual average: 2008-2013), one of the main producers of wine in the European Union, together with France and Italy; there are 3,700 enterprises located in Spain employing 24,000 workers. Meanwhile, in the spirits sector, United Kingdom and France are the main producers.

Based on the EUIPO´s report, we could conclude that Spain is one of the most affected countries when talking about infringement in spirits and wine. These incidents have consequences, not only on sales, government revenue and other participants in the industry, but on employment as well.

If we focus on the figures, the lost sales due to counterfeiting in Spain are €263 million (annual average: 2008-2013), being €173 million related only to spirits and €90 million related to wines; comparing these figures with the rest of the countries, in relative sales, although the lost wine sales are at the EU average (2.3%), the loss in spirits (10.4%) is only surpassed by Lithuania, Greece and Cyprus.

As previously stated, this situation affects employment; actually, this report confirms that, in Spain, there is a loss in employment of 969 people, the highest in the EU. This amount only represents a part of the problem, if we include the employment loss together with the rest of the industries involved, the total amount turns into 5,064 people.

Finally, the government revenue loss due to counterfeiting in Spain can be translated into €90 million lost.

This information provides a global vision of a problematic situation and it is really valuable for each country to see its scope so they can evaluate it and take action against these infringements as well as trying to minimise them; also, it is highly recommended to make people know about IP rights, making them aware of the actual and the potential consequences of infringement, so as to not become a part of it.

mendigutia.jpg

Manuela Mendigutía


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
Gift this article