Spain: IP infringement in spirits and wine

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Spain: IP infringement in spirits and wine

The European Observatory on infringement on Intellectual Property Rights has made a report in relation to the economic cost of infringements in spirits and wine in the European Union; this report aims to evaluate the consequences of counterfeiting in a concrete field, comparing the sales forecast and the actual sales.

In this case, the Observatory only refers to manufacturing companies; it does not include wholesale and retail trade.

As an introduction, and focusing primarily on Spain, it is, with €6 billion (annual average: 2008-2013), one of the main producers of wine in the European Union, together with France and Italy; there are 3,700 enterprises located in Spain employing 24,000 workers. Meanwhile, in the spirits sector, United Kingdom and France are the main producers.

Based on the EUIPO´s report, we could conclude that Spain is one of the most affected countries when talking about infringement in spirits and wine. These incidents have consequences, not only on sales, government revenue and other participants in the industry, but on employment as well.

If we focus on the figures, the lost sales due to counterfeiting in Spain are €263 million (annual average: 2008-2013), being €173 million related only to spirits and €90 million related to wines; comparing these figures with the rest of the countries, in relative sales, although the lost wine sales are at the EU average (2.3%), the loss in spirits (10.4%) is only surpassed by Lithuania, Greece and Cyprus.

As previously stated, this situation affects employment; actually, this report confirms that, in Spain, there is a loss in employment of 969 people, the highest in the EU. This amount only represents a part of the problem, if we include the employment loss together with the rest of the industries involved, the total amount turns into 5,064 people.

Finally, the government revenue loss due to counterfeiting in Spain can be translated into €90 million lost.

This information provides a global vision of a problematic situation and it is really valuable for each country to see its scope so they can evaluate it and take action against these infringements as well as trying to minimise them; also, it is highly recommended to make people know about IP rights, making them aware of the actual and the potential consequences of infringement, so as to not become a part of it.

mendigutia.jpg

Manuela Mendigutía


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Michelle Lee discusses reaching milestones at the USPTO, AI’s role in legal work, and how to empower women in tech and IP
Executive chair Matt Dixon, who reveals a new associate hire, says the firm wants to offer a realistic pathway to partnership while avoiding the ‘corporate machine’ route
Mayer Brown’s role in cardiovascular technology dispute reflects how firms are pursuing precedent-setting cases to try and guide AI and patent law
Gift this article