Mexico: Trade mark implications of new import requirements

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Mexico: Trade mark implications of new import requirements

Tax avoidance involving the import of undeclared trade marked items has led the Mexican Customs authorities to change the regulations governing the information that must be submitted.

Over the last few years the Mexican Customs authorities have detected an increasing importation problem of sub-valued goods. The problem arises when companies importing goods into the Mexican market do not mark the goods with the brand names they will be sold under.

In this way many companies were able to report a lower value of imported goods. The goods were not bearing any trade mark, and that made it possible for the importers to pay a lower tax rate since the value of goods that are not branded is much lower than that of products supported by a well-known trade mark.

Although this is originally a tax problem, the Mexican government made an attempt to attack it from both tax and IP perspectives.

Accordingly on January 27 2016 the Mexican Customs authorities published a new regulation known as Rule 3.1.17, which included an additional requirement for the importers of several products to provide certain information related to the trade marks that the imported goods will bear.

In addition, it has become a common practice of Mexican Customs brokers assisting the importing companies to request from their clients (the importing company) a letter granted by the trade mark owner (or its local representative) confirming authorisation to import and sell the goods using their trade mark.

This sort of letter is not required by the Mexican regulations nor Customs officers but by private Customs brokers to make sure the importing company is not infringing third parties' rights and that the goods imported are original products and not counterfeit.

ramirez.jpg

Victor Ramirez


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article