Scandinavia: New court structure in Sweden

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Scandinavia: New court structure in Sweden

The court structure in Sweden for IP matters has recently been reformed and a specialized Patent and Market Court is being established to take over all patent-related cases within the next couple of years. The new Court will handle all IP, marketing and competition law cases and is operational as of September 1 2016. The new specialised court replaces the former Court of Patent Appeals and Market Court, as well as the civil disputes in the field handled by Stockholm District Court.

The Court of Patent Appeals has previously had competence in appeals in administrative matters where the Swedish Patent and Registration Office has issued decisions, while the relevant district courts and courts of appeal have been the competent courts in infringement and cancellation matters.

Instead of having two separate ways for handling administrative and contentious matters, the new specialised IP court will deal with both infringement/cancellation matters as well as appeals on decisions from the Swedish Patent and Registration Office. Hence, the risk of parallel proceedings relating to the same dispute/right will be abolished, and the reform further has the advantage of higher specialisation in the Patent and Market Court and thereby greater predictability.

In civil proceedings (including infringements, cancellations and declarations of non-infringement) the new structure means that the Patent and Market Court will be the first instance court, the Patent and Market Appeal Court is the second instance and a possibility to appeal to the Supreme Court is retained. The new Patent and Market Court is part of the Stockholm District Court. The Patent and Market Appeal Court is part of the Svea Court of Appeal, which is located in Stockholm.

The hierarchy in administrative matters would be the same except for a further instance which will be the Patent and Registration Office dealing with applications, oppositions etc, and from where appeals may be filed to the Patent and Market Court, followed by the Patent and Market Appeal Court and finally the Supreme Court.

Leave to appeal may be granted by the Patent and Market Appeal Court for cases from the Patent and Market Court. With regard to appeals of decisions or judgments from the Patent and Market Appeal Court to the Supreme Court, it is first required that the Patent and Market Appeal Court allows the appeal to be tried by the Supreme Court and this would only be possible if there is a precedential interest for a review by the Supreme Court.

In addition to the approval by the Patent and Market Appeal Court, the Supreme Court must grant its leave to appeal in order for the decision/judgment to be tried by that court. Should either of the courts decide not to grant a leave to appeal, the decision from the lower court cannot not be appealed, and the judgment or decision from the lower court becomes final.

Administrative matters pending in the Patent Court of Appeals on September 1 2016 are transferred to the Patent and Market Court, since the former court ceased to exist on this date. With regard to already pending civil cases in district courts or appellate courts, these will not be transferred to the new courts but will be adjudicated according to the old structure.

agnvall.jpg
zacco.jpg

Claes Agnvall

Malin Thunberg McCann


ZaccoArne Jacobsens Alle 15DK-2300 Copenhagen S DenmarkTel: +45 39 48 80 00Fax: +45 39 48 80 80contact@zacco.comwww.zacco.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Latham & Watkins bolstered its IP litigation bench in California with the addition of Kieran Kieckhefer, as partner demand for trial-ready expertise shows no sign of slowing
With the launch of a new patent eligibility AI tool, Sterne Kessler is leading a growing movement of law firms taking AI development into their own hands
UPC cases are (very) gradually becoming more distributed across other local divisions outside Germany, which can only be good news for the pan-European forum
Clarification concerning jurisdictional reach and latest stats released by the court were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
Although unanimous decision by the top court clarifies several aspects of the honest concurrent use defence, practitioners say ambiguities remain
Tristan Sherliker says he hopes to solve an access to justice issue by making the automated court bundle tool free to use
The team, comprising two partners and one senior consultant, plans to offer “highly differentiated” services to clients
HGF’s new ownership model frees it from the hiring constraints of traditional partnerships, its CEO told Managing IP
New timeline for 2026 aims to provide clearer guidance to firms and practitioners on the full jurisdictional market view
Attorneys contemplate whether clients using AI for legal guidance is beneficial to attorney-client relationships or more of a nuisance
Gift this article