Turkey: What will the new IP Code bring?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Turkey: What will the new IP Code bring?

On February 24 2016, the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology circulated the draft IP Code on the website of Turkish Patent Institute (TPI). Having passed through various informal and formal consultation stages, the draft IP Code is now in its final enactment stage before the Turkish Parliament and expected to enter into force before the end of 2016.

The draft IP code will replace the decree-laws pertaining to protection of trade marks, patents, geographical indications and designs, all of which date back to 1995, by consolidating most of the existing provisions of those decree-laws. It also proposes various amendments by considering the recent developments in international legal sources and the decisions of the high courts. The most important proposed amendments are:

  • The graphical representation criteria for trade mark applications will not be required anymore.

  • Letters of consent will be accepted in overcoming senior identical or indistinguishably similar trade marks from being a statutory ground of refusal.

  • Opposers of published trademark applications will be asked to prove genuine use or provide justified reasons for non-use of their trade marks that are the basis for opposition and registered for more than five years, if requested by the applicant. The opposition will be rejected if such use cannot be proven. This request can also be used as a defence in an infringement action.

  • Novelty examination will be introduced for design applications.

  • Unregistered designs shall be protected for three years as of when they become publicly available.

  • The criterion for distinctiveness will be changed to "difference" from "significant difference".

  • Unseen parts/devices (such as parts of an engine) will not be registered as designs.

  • A post-grant opposition system will be introduced for patent applications in line with Article 101 of the European Patent Convention. With the introduction of this system, patent owners will be entitled to amend the patent during the opposition phase, after the first grant decision.

  • The grounds for compulsory licensing of patents will be broadened.

  • The vague provisions of the decree law on prior user rights, use/work requirement of a patent and service invention will be improved.

  • A trade mark, patent and/or design right holder will no longer be able to allege its registered right as a defence in an infringement action filed by a prior right holder. Consequently, having a registration would not always serve as a defence in infringement cases.

aktekin.jpg

Ugur Atketin


Gün + PartnersKore Şehitleri Cad. 17Zincirlikuyu 34394İstanbul, TurkeyTel: + (90) (212) 354 00 00Fax: + (90) (212) 274 20 95gun@gun.av.trgun.av.tr

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Nigel Stoate, head of Taylor Wessing's award-winning UK patents team, tells us about his team’s UPC successes and why collaboration is king
Camilla Balleny, who spent a decade at Carpmaels & Ransford, will become the firm’s first head of patent litigation, Managing IP can reveal
Leaders at the newly merged firm Jones Maxwell Smith & Davis reveal their plan to take on bigger firms while attracting more clients and talent
Charles Achkar, who will bring a team of two with him, said he was excited about joining ‘one of the few strong IP boutiques’
Andy Lee, head of IP at Brandsmiths and winner of the Soft IP Practitioner of the Year award, tells us why 2024 was a seminal year and why clients value brave advice
The deal to acquire MIP's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
Jinwon Chun discusses the need for vigilance, his love for iced coffee, and preparing for INTA
Karl Barnfather’s new patent practice will focus on protecting and enforcing tech innovations in the electronics, AI, and software industries
Partner Ranjini Acharya explains how her Federal Circuit debut resulted in her convincing the court to rule that machine learning technology was not patent-eligible
Paul Hastings and Smart & Biggar also won multiple awards, while Baker McKenzie picked up a significant prize
Gift this article