Judges consider disparagement versus free speech

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Judges consider disparagement versus free speech

A session examining the interaction between trademarks and free speech included judges from three jurisdictions offering their perspectives on some hot-button issues and how their respective courts approach them.

Judges Kara Farnandez Stoll and Kimberly A. Moore, both of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Elisabeth Ohm, Deputy Director of the Norwegian Board of Appeal for Industrial Property Rights; and Yasuhito Okinaka of The IP division of the Tokyo District Court answered questions posed by moderator Rachel Rudensky of Akerman, LLP in the U.S.

The takeaway was that, when it comes to the line between disparagement and free speech, viewpoints vary widely by culture, venue—and even trademark examiner. While Norway’s approach is fairly liberal, marks considered offensive to a “substantial composite” of a particular group are often rejected by the USPTO, said the panelists. In Japan, any mark that is potentially damaging to “public order or morality” can be refused.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
A cross-practice team from Mayer Brown, which included members of the firm’s IP practice, advised on the deal
María Cecilia Romoleroux discusses the challenges she has faced in her career in IP and how she hopes to improve things for the next generation of women
Value-added services give in-house counsel the satisfaction that they are getting more value for money, while law firms get the opportunity to win more work
A team at Boies Schiller Flexner is advising shoe company Kizik and parent company HandsFree Labs in the dispute
Nokia’s latest enforcement actions against Geely and Transsion joining Via LA’s AAC pool were also among the top talking points
Benjamin Kelly, the firm’s fifth IP partner hire in a little over one year, has experience in patent and trade secret disputes involving complex technologies
Gift this article