Spain: Impact of EU trade mark reforms in Spain

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Spain: Impact of EU trade mark reforms in Spain

On December 23 2015, the Official Journal of the European Union published the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The aim of this Directive is to reach a further harmonisation of provisions of substantive and procedural laws relating to the trade mark systems at national and EU level.

The new EU Trade Mark Regulation adopted by the European Union Intellectual Property Office applies from March 23 2016.

Member states are bound to adapt their national laws to transpose this new Directive by January 14 2019, except for Article 45, concerning the procedure for revocation or declaration of invalidity, which will enter into force from January 15 2023.

As regards those amendments that represent substantive changes, as compared with the current Spanish regulations, three of them deserve special attention.

The first one concerns the new concept of a trade mark, where the requirement of graphic representation disappears. The requirement the new definition embraces is that signs must be represented in a manner that allows the competent authorities and the public to determine, clearly and precisely, the subject matter of the protection. Therefore, it will be required to provide for new appropriate ways of representation.

The second change has to do with the opposition procedure. Spanish trade mark law already provides for an administrative opposition procedure. Thus, the challenge lies in putting into practice a system embracing non-use of the prior sign as a defence.

Therefore, at the request of the applicant, the opposing party will have to demonstrate that the prior sign has been in use, within a five-year period preceding the filing date or priority date of the later trade mark. If the opponent fails to provide evidence of use, the opposition will be rejected, unless there are proper reasons for non-use.

The third amendment refers to providing for an administrative procedure for revocation or declaration of invalidity of a trade mark. At present, parties are compelled to appeal to the courts.

These reforms lead to the following conclusions.

First, the new concept of trade mark will facilitate the registration of non-traditional signs. Second, proving the genuine use of a prior sign will be inevitably to exercise the rights arising from its registration, as oppose to the present Spanish regulation. Finally, administrative procedures for revocation or declaration of invalidity will involve a significant change in the Spanish trade mark system to invalidate a trade mark where there is some ground for refusal.

Urrea

Carmen Urrea


PONS IPGlorieta Rubén Darío, 428010 – Madrid SpainTel: +34 917007600Fax: +34 913086103clientes@pons.eswww.ponsip.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
Gift this article