Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

On March 23 2016 the new Trade Mark Regulation 2015/2424 will enter into force. This Regulation is the result of the European Commission's pledge to make the new trade mark registration system more accessible, efficient, flexible, reliable and predictable.

Where previously a Community trade mark could only consist of signs capable of being represented graphically, the requirement of graphical representation has been abandoned in the Regulation. The elimination of this requirement opens the door for the registration of non-traditional trade marks such as smells, sounds, holograms and motion marks, which, previously, were difficult or impossible to represent graphically.

Representation by other than graphical means may in some cases allow a more precise identification of the mark, increasing legal certainty. A representation of a sound mark by means of a digital sound file, for instance, will contain more information than the representation of notes on a scale, since it allows to also identify the interpretation of the music, including the instruments used, speed, volume, etc.

This new legislation is aligned with the Sieckmann (C-273/00) criteria set forth by the CJEU. According to this ruling, a trade mark should be represented in a manner that is clear and precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective. Article 4(b) of the Regulation confirms that a European Union trade mark should be capable of being represented in the Register in such a way that the competent authorities and the public are able to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to its proprietor.

The removal of the graphical representation requirement in the new Regulation is certainly a positive evolution towards the registration of non-traditional trade marks, which are becoming more important in the digital age. This clears the way for developing new more comprehensive (corporate) branding strategies covering many more ways of representing brands and what they stand for. However, the requirement of a "clear and precise subject matter" should avoid a boundless extension of the admissible ways to represent a sign.

The future will show the effect of this new legislation on non-traditional trade marks. It will be interesting to follow how the European Union Intellectual Property Office and the CJEU will handle applications for non-traditional trade marks in the light of the Regulation.

Borms-Madhuri

Madhuri Borms


Gevers & OresHolidaystraat, 5B-1831 Diegem - BrusselsBelgiumTel: +32 2 715 37 11Fax: +32 2 715 37 00www.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Camilla Balleny, who spent a decade at Carpmaels & Ransford, will become the firm’s first head of patent litigation, Managing IP can reveal
Leaders at the newly merged firm Jones Maxwell Smith & Davis reveal their plan to take on bigger firms while attracting more clients and talent
Charles Achkar, who will bring a team of two with him, said he was excited about joining ‘one of the few strong IP boutiques’
Andy Lee, head of IP at Brandsmiths and winner of the Soft IP Practitioner of the Year award, tells us why 2024 was a seminal year and why clients value brave advice
The deal to acquire MIP's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
Jinwon Chun discusses the need for vigilance, his love for iced coffee, and preparing for INTA
Karl Barnfather’s new patent practice will focus on protecting and enforcing tech innovations in the electronics, AI, and software industries
Partner Ranjini Acharya explains how her Federal Circuit debut resulted in her convincing the court to rule that machine learning technology was not patent-eligible
Paul Hastings and Smart & Biggar also won multiple awards, while Baker McKenzie picked up a significant prize
Burford Capital study finds that in-house lawyers have become more likely to monetise patents, but that their IP portfolios are still underutilised
Gift this article