Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

On March 23 2016 the new Trade Mark Regulation 2015/2424 will enter into force. This Regulation is the result of the European Commission's pledge to make the new trade mark registration system more accessible, efficient, flexible, reliable and predictable.

Where previously a Community trade mark could only consist of signs capable of being represented graphically, the requirement of graphical representation has been abandoned in the Regulation. The elimination of this requirement opens the door for the registration of non-traditional trade marks such as smells, sounds, holograms and motion marks, which, previously, were difficult or impossible to represent graphically.

Representation by other than graphical means may in some cases allow a more precise identification of the mark, increasing legal certainty. A representation of a sound mark by means of a digital sound file, for instance, will contain more information than the representation of notes on a scale, since it allows to also identify the interpretation of the music, including the instruments used, speed, volume, etc.

This new legislation is aligned with the Sieckmann (C-273/00) criteria set forth by the CJEU. According to this ruling, a trade mark should be represented in a manner that is clear and precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective. Article 4(b) of the Regulation confirms that a European Union trade mark should be capable of being represented in the Register in such a way that the competent authorities and the public are able to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to its proprietor.

The removal of the graphical representation requirement in the new Regulation is certainly a positive evolution towards the registration of non-traditional trade marks, which are becoming more important in the digital age. This clears the way for developing new more comprehensive (corporate) branding strategies covering many more ways of representing brands and what they stand for. However, the requirement of a "clear and precise subject matter" should avoid a boundless extension of the admissible ways to represent a sign.

The future will show the effect of this new legislation on non-traditional trade marks. It will be interesting to follow how the European Union Intellectual Property Office and the CJEU will handle applications for non-traditional trade marks in the light of the Regulation.

Borms-Madhuri

Madhuri Borms


Gevers & OresHolidaystraat, 5B-1831 Diegem - BrusselsBelgiumTel: +32 2 715 37 11Fax: +32 2 715 37 00www.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

VO, which has offices in the Netherlands, Belgium and Germany, is the second European IP firm to secure external backing this week
The Bardehle Pagenberg attorneys-at-law discuss the firm’s Managing IP EMEA Awards 2026 success, Unified Patent Court litigation strategy, and evolving European patent trends
A patent battle between two legal tech companies and a loss for Elon Musk’s xAI against OpenAI were also among the top talking points
With drug prices a hot topic in the US, courts are seemingly more reluctant to prevent the entry of generics to the market
Academic Eden Sarid joins us during Pride Month to discuss queer expression and IP law, Patagonia v Pattie Gonia, and how queer and AI-generated creations both pose novelty concerns
Patent attorney Michael Henson joins the firm to lead its freshly launched blockchain and digital assets practice
A dispute over mammogram technology, and a development in the case between GSK and Moderna were also among the top talking points in recent weeks
With rankings for Western Europe set to be published on June 25, we sat down with our research lead to find out what practitioners and law firms can expect
Peter O’Sullivan, a professional services executive, says he is looking forward to helping Pearce IP become the leading life sciences firm in Australia and New Zealand
Matteo Di Lernia, advocate at LCA Studio Legale, unpicks the CJEU’s ruling in M.M. Ristorazione v Villa Ramazzini, including its impact on litigation strategies
Gift this article