Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

On March 23 2016 the new Trade Mark Regulation 2015/2424 will enter into force. This Regulation is the result of the European Commission's pledge to make the new trade mark registration system more accessible, efficient, flexible, reliable and predictable.

Where previously a Community trade mark could only consist of signs capable of being represented graphically, the requirement of graphical representation has been abandoned in the Regulation. The elimination of this requirement opens the door for the registration of non-traditional trade marks such as smells, sounds, holograms and motion marks, which, previously, were difficult or impossible to represent graphically.

Representation by other than graphical means may in some cases allow a more precise identification of the mark, increasing legal certainty. A representation of a sound mark by means of a digital sound file, for instance, will contain more information than the representation of notes on a scale, since it allows to also identify the interpretation of the music, including the instruments used, speed, volume, etc.

This new legislation is aligned with the Sieckmann (C-273/00) criteria set forth by the CJEU. According to this ruling, a trade mark should be represented in a manner that is clear and precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective. Article 4(b) of the Regulation confirms that a European Union trade mark should be capable of being represented in the Register in such a way that the competent authorities and the public are able to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to its proprietor.

The removal of the graphical representation requirement in the new Regulation is certainly a positive evolution towards the registration of non-traditional trade marks, which are becoming more important in the digital age. This clears the way for developing new more comprehensive (corporate) branding strategies covering many more ways of representing brands and what they stand for. However, the requirement of a "clear and precise subject matter" should avoid a boundless extension of the admissible ways to represent a sign.

The future will show the effect of this new legislation on non-traditional trade marks. It will be interesting to follow how the European Union Intellectual Property Office and the CJEU will handle applications for non-traditional trade marks in the light of the Regulation.

Borms-Madhuri

Madhuri Borms


Gevers & OresHolidaystraat, 5B-1831 Diegem - BrusselsBelgiumTel: +32 2 715 37 11Fax: +32 2 715 37 00www.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Vivien Chan joins us for our ‘Women in IP’ series to discuss gender bias in the legal profession and why the business model followed by law firms leaves little room for women leaders
Partner Jeremy Hertzog explains how his team worked through a huge amount of disclosure from Adidas and what victory means for the firm
Evarist Kameja and Hadija Juma at Bowmans explain why a new law in Tanzania marks a significant shift in IP enforcement
In the wake of controversy surrounding Banksy’s recent London mural, AJ Park’s Thomas Huthwaite and Eloise Calder delve into the challenges street artists face in protecting their works and rights
Alex Levkin, founder of IPNote, discusses reshaping the filing industry through legal tech, and why practitioners’ advice should stretch beyond immediate legal needs
Cohausz & Florack, together with Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben, has taken action against Amazon on behalf of three VIA LA licensors
In the fourth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss unconscious bias in the IP workplace and how to address it
Greg Munt, who has moved from Griffith Hack to James & Wells after four decades, hails his new firm’s approach to client service
Practitioners warn that closing the Denver regional office could trigger a domino effect, threatening local innovation and access to IP resources
Gift this article