Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Belgium: Graphical representation requirement abandoned

On March 23 2016 the new Trade Mark Regulation 2015/2424 will enter into force. This Regulation is the result of the European Commission's pledge to make the new trade mark registration system more accessible, efficient, flexible, reliable and predictable.

Where previously a Community trade mark could only consist of signs capable of being represented graphically, the requirement of graphical representation has been abandoned in the Regulation. The elimination of this requirement opens the door for the registration of non-traditional trade marks such as smells, sounds, holograms and motion marks, which, previously, were difficult or impossible to represent graphically.

Representation by other than graphical means may in some cases allow a more precise identification of the mark, increasing legal certainty. A representation of a sound mark by means of a digital sound file, for instance, will contain more information than the representation of notes on a scale, since it allows to also identify the interpretation of the music, including the instruments used, speed, volume, etc.

This new legislation is aligned with the Sieckmann (C-273/00) criteria set forth by the CJEU. According to this ruling, a trade mark should be represented in a manner that is clear and precise, self-contained, easily accessible, intelligible, durable and objective. Article 4(b) of the Regulation confirms that a European Union trade mark should be capable of being represented in the Register in such a way that the competent authorities and the public are able to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to its proprietor.

The removal of the graphical representation requirement in the new Regulation is certainly a positive evolution towards the registration of non-traditional trade marks, which are becoming more important in the digital age. This clears the way for developing new more comprehensive (corporate) branding strategies covering many more ways of representing brands and what they stand for. However, the requirement of a "clear and precise subject matter" should avoid a boundless extension of the admissible ways to represent a sign.

The future will show the effect of this new legislation on non-traditional trade marks. It will be interesting to follow how the European Union Intellectual Property Office and the CJEU will handle applications for non-traditional trade marks in the light of the Regulation.

Borms-Madhuri

Madhuri Borms


Gevers & OresHolidaystraat, 5B-1831 Diegem - BrusselsBelgiumTel: +32 2 715 37 11Fax: +32 2 715 37 00www.gevers.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

New members of the Access Advance patent pool and Harvard University coming under fire were also among the top talking points
Team from Graham Watt & Co will join Beck Greener’s London office
The firm reported a small uptick in overall revenue and profit per equity partner, while its IP team secured notable life sciences victories
Paul Ainsworth, who secured a settlement for his client in a patent dispute, says the case shows why medical claims by dietary supplement companies can threaten IP rights
Boies Schiller Flexner joins forces with Grünecker to target Skechers in Europe following US lawsuit
Helen Mutimer discusses how the firm’s IP advisory services are filling a gap in the market, and why life sciences work is soaring
In major recent developments, a confidentiality request was rejected, Samsung and its representative A&O Shearman secured a partial win, and EIP made a new hire
Tomas Wässingbo joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to explain why he wants to change the perception around designs
PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the Australian Taxation Office was advised by Australian-headquartered law firm MinterEllison
The firm said revenue from its ‘refreshed and expanded’ IP team increased by 4% in FY25
Gift this article