How IP practice is changing

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

How IP practice is changing

How might your work change in the next 10 years? Or 20 years? With daily deadlines and clamorous clients, most IP practitioners probably don’t have the luxury to predict the future. But maybe that’s exactly what you should be doing

September 2015 cover

In an article just posted online (and printed as the cover story in the September issue), Emma Barraclough discusses seven trends that are disrupting the IP market – from technology to globalisation via cost pressures, the changing demands on in-house counsel and the emergence of new competitors.

The article also looks at some of the new businesses that are emerging in the IP marketplace, such as IP-Portunity, A&O’s contract lawyer business Peerpoint and the virtual firm K2. And interviewees such as Katrina Burchell, Bart Lieben and Gwilym Roberts offer their own predictions about how IP practice will develop in the future.

Some of the trends will be familiar to readers: tighter budgets, desire for more flexible working, the move away from the billable hour and the need for more sophisticated advice. Others, such as the need for multi-faceted advice, the use of part- or unqualified people for certain tasks, and the integration of IP advice into general business strategy, may be more of a surprise.

IBM Watson

Some of these trends are simply the result of economic and social shifts, others come from specific legal changes such as the global growth of the Madrid Protocol, the popularity of the PTAB in the US and harmonisation in Europe (some patent practitioners turn white just at the mention of the Unitary Patent and UPC). Yet others are side-effects of changes in technology, such as electronic filing and renewal, and more rapid communication.

Taken to extremes, that begs questions such as: could a robot do your job? Would it be better than you are? CIPA, the UK’s patent attorney association, is holding a debate on exactly that topic in November (motion: “This House believes it is inevitable that, within 25 years, a patent will be filed and granted without human intervention”). In a recent article, Charles WK Gritton, chief technology officer of Hillcrest Labs, went even further, asking “Will Watson [the IBM supercomputer, pictured left] make patents obsolete?”

These may seem like abstract questions, but as fundamental challenges circle the IP business they will become increasingly real for many practitioners. And ultimately those who will be successful will embrace the changes rather than ignore them.

Thanks and good luck!

Emma Barraclough

Sadly, this article is Emma’s last for Managing IP, as she is leaving us to pursue new opportunities. She joined back in November 2003, initially as Asia editor based in our Hong Kong office, where her legal experience and ability to speak Chinese was invaluable in building up our coverage of the region.

From 2006 until this year, Emma was based in the UK and has had a range of roles including editing the monthly magazine, interviewing many leading IP figures, helping establish this blog and, most recently, building the popular Women in IP Network. She will be familiar to many readers not just for her clear, balanced and thoughtful writing but also as the face of many of our awards dinners and conferences. You may have seen her rushing past on her fold-up bicycle at events as far afield as Beijing and San Diego!

It’s been a great pleasure to work with Emma over the past 12 years and we will miss her on Managing IP but wish her and her family well for the future. Readers may be interested to know that we are now hiring for a reporter/deputy editor based in the UK (job description and salary will depend on qualifications and experience): details and an application form are available here. Please pass these details on to anyone who you think might be interested.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
Gift this article