Philippines: IPOPHL logo attacked

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Philippines: IPOPHL logo attacked

On September 22 2015, Kristian Kabuay, a blogger in the website baybayin.com accused the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) of having stolen its Baybayin logo. The controversial logo is shown.


Baybayin is an ancient Philippine script and not generally understood in the Philippines, but its characters are used artistically and part of Philippine heritage. For example, the Philippine banknotes issued in 2010 contained Baybayin characters. The graphic image contained within the circular device of the IPOPHL logo pertains to the Baybayin equivalent of the Tagalog word "una" meaning first. The bloggers claim that sometime in 2011, a certain John Leyson made a presentation to redesign IPOPHL's logo and came out with the above graphic image, with a description. They also claim that the use by the IPOPHL (which launched the logo some time in October 2011 but without acknowledging Leyson or paying him) is not fair use.

On September 23 2015, the IPOPHL reacting to Kabuay's article and those who posted their comments issued an official statement in its website: that it commissioned the Design Center of the Philippines to design the logo in consultation with IPOPHL officials in August 2011, and has used it since its launching; that it was only on May 25 2015 or four years from its logo launching, that the IPOPHL was made aware of the demands of Leyson and other entities in the Baybayin group, for payment in the amount of Ps500,000 ($10,500) as compensation for the design, concept and use of the logo, which the IPOPHL rejected during one of the meetings with said group.

According to the IPOPHL, it has never met nor transacted with any one of the members or officers of the Baybayin group from conceptualisation to completion of the logo. The IPOPHL also stated that Baybayin characters are commonly used on logos of several government agencies, and since the Baybayin is an ancient script, no one has an exclusive right to use it. On September 25, Kabuay commented on the IPOPHL's official statement, and warned of the bomb that Leyson would drop.

Hechanova_Editha-100

Editha R Hechanova


Hechanova & Co., Inc.Chemphil Bldg.851 Antonio Arnaiz AvenueMakati City 1223, PhilippinesTel: (63) 2 812-6561Fax: (63) 2 888-4290editharh@hechanova.com.ph  www.hechanova.com.ph

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Junior lawyers aren’t unwilling to work hard, as some seniors believe; rather, they are rejecting traditional career advancement models that have limited payoff
Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Gift this article