Turkey: Turkey introduces mandatory mediation for money-related IP disputes

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Turkey: Turkey introduces mandatory mediation for money-related IP disputes

Pursuant to the recent Code of Commencement of Execution Proceedings in Monetary Receivables Arising from Subscription Agreements (the Code) published in Official Gazette dated December 19 2018, mediation is now mandatory for commercial receivables claims. In line with Article 20 of the Code, Article 5/A is incorporated into the Turkish Commercial Code (TCC). This requires mediation for commercial receivables claims, in which compensation or payment of a certain amount is requested. Accordingly, mediation is a pre-condition of bringing a lawsuit before the courts. This recent development was implemented on January 1 2019.

Though the aforementioned Article 5/A does not clearly include IP-related disputes, according to Article 4/d of the TCC, civil suits regulated under IP-related codes are deemed as commercial where a request for compensation or payment of a certain amount is sought, for instance disputes arising from the price of licence agreements or transfer of IP rights and compensation due to IP right infringements etc.

Before mediation was stipulated as a pre-condition for commercial receivables claims, the Law on Labour Courts made mediation mandatory from January 1 2018 for labour disputes arising from an employment contract in which compensation or re-employment is sought. According to statistics shared by the Ministry of Justice, 65% of disputes were closed by mandatory mediation between January 2 2018 and May 27 2018. As a result of mandatory mediation introduced for commercial receivables actions from 2019, a notable reduction in commercial courts' workload is expected/hoped for as was achieved for labour disputes. It is also worth mentioning that mediation was first incorporated into the Turkish legal system as a discretionary alternative dispute resolution method in 2013 by Law no. 6325 on Mediation in Civil Disputes.

Though mediation is a relatively new concept for dispute resolution, it is possible to say that it has rapidly progressed in Turkey. Mediation offers parties a chance to reach an amicable solution by spending reasonable effort, time and cost and as a consequence was made mandatory first for labour and then commercial receivables actions, including some IP related-matters. However, still, in a certain number of cases it is considered a burdensome procedure that has to be completed before reaching the main stage – legal action.

In time, mediation might become mandatory for other types of IP disputes. Though it is expected that mandatory mediation will decrease the workload of IP courts, the impact of this new development cannot clearly be predicted, since it is conceptually new for Turkey where a culture of litigation dominates. We will wait and see what this brand new update brings to Turkish IP law.

alkan.jpg

Güldeniz

Doğan Alkan


Gün + PartnersKore Şehitleri Cad. 17Zincirlikuyu 34394İstanbul, TurkeyTel: + (90) (212) 354 00 00Fax: + (90) (212) 274 20 95gun@gun.av.trgun.av.tr

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

IP leaders at Brandsmiths and Bird & Bird, who were on opposing sides at the UK Supreme Court in Iconix v Dream Pairs, unpick the landmark case and its ramifications
Magdalena Bonde discusses Abion’s AI experiments and reveals why an entrepreneurial mindset and a willingness to learn about a business are essential skills
Partner Ginevra Righini explains how she secured victory for the Comité Champagne in its fight against an EUTM application for ‘Nero Champagne’
Volkan Hamamcıoğlu joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss meditation, tackling deadlines, and taking inspiration from Hamlet
A $110 million US verdict against Apple and an appellate order staying a $39 million trademark infringement finding against Amazon were also among the top talking points
Attorneys are watching how AI affects trademark registrations and whether a SCOTUS ruling from last year will have broader free speech implications
Patent lawyers explain why they will be keeping an eye on the implications of a pharma case and on changes at the USPTO in the second half of 2025
The insensitive reaction to a UK politician crying on TV proves we have a long way to go before we can say we are tackling workplace wellbeing
Adrian Percer says he was impressed by the firm’s work on billion-dollar cases as well as its culture
In our latest interview with women IP leaders, Catherine Bonner at Murgitroyd discusses technology, training, and teaching
Gift this article