Italy to join Unitary Patent – minister

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Italy to join Unitary Patent – minister

UPC

Italian State Secretary for European Affairs Sandro Gozi confirmed that Italy will join the Unitary Patent during a public session of the EU Competitiveness Council in Brussels

UPC

Gozi (below left) intervened during a discussion on the EU trade mark reform package today, saying he had to leave the meeting shortly.

He said (English translation): “The Italian government has decided to agree to enhanced cooperation on the Unitary Patent. We have also started a procedure to amend the court procedure and we hope that this will move forward very fast.”

“We felt it was necessary to do this because the conditions were ripe. This has no impact on the language discrimination point. We still think this is something which is a dividing factor rather than a unifying factor and the Unitary Patent shouldn’t be seen as a precedent on this linguistic matter.”

Gozi's speech starts at about 2 hours 41 minutes into the video recording of the meeting. He gave more details on Italy’s position in a video interview after leaving the meeting (in Italian).

Sandro Gozi

Italy was one of two countries along with Spain that did not take part in the enhanced cooperation that led to the Regulations on the Unitary Patent. Both countries had concerns about the English/French/German language regime.

Despite this, Italy had signed the UPC Agreement and planned to host a local division of the Court in Milan.

However, its opposition had weakened in recent years and there were strong rumours that it would sign up to the Unitary Patent after the CJEU rejected Spain’s challenge earlier this month.

Spain remains outside the system, and Poland and Croatia are unlikely to take part at least at the beginning.

Trade mark package

Also during the meeting, UK Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and SKills Baroness Neville-Rolfe (below right) said the UK was not able to support the recently agreed trade mark package in its entirety since “it enables future revenue surpluses at OHIM to be transferred to the general budget and this is a red line for the UK. As IP minister, I would prefer any surpluses to be recycled to support innovation, enforcement etc.”

Lucy Neville-Rolfe

Germany’s State Secretary, Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection Gerd Billen added: “As to how the question of how national institutions will cooperate, I think we have come up with a valid proposal on this.”

EU Commissioner Elżbieta Bieńkowska welcomed the agreement, saying it would help to more effectively tackle counterfeit products. “The Commission did have concerns about the financial aspects and governance of OHIM, and these concerns remain. We have issued a statement and will still discuss it. In the view of true added value for users, the Commission has decided to support it even with those concerns,” she said.

More details about the trade mark reform package are expected to be revealed next month.

Also on the Council’s agenda today was the Digital Single Market, which was discussed off-camera.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Acquisition of platform developed by Boehmert & Boehmert lawyer set to create a combined platform for patent drafting and prosecution in Europe
Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Gift this article