Japan embraces non-traditional marks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Japan embraces non-traditional marks

In yesterday’s Japan Patent Office (JPO) User’s Meeting, representatives from the JPO provided INTA Annual Meeting registrants with an update on the how the Office is handling non-traditional marks.

The latest amendment to Japan’s Trademark Act allows for the registration of non-traditional marks. Since the new rules came into effect on April 1 this year, the JPO has received applications for 248 color marks, 194 sound marks, 117 position marks, 45 motion marks and three holograms.

The JPO representatives explained that the 607 applications they have received are more than they had originally expected and likely reflect pent-up user demand. The Office has a team especially tasked with examining these marks, but expects that it may take slightly longer to examine these applications, at least initially.

Applicants need to be aware of the specific requirements for each type of mark. For example, applicants for sound marks can provide an audio file for the mark, but the file must be submitted on a CD-R or DVD-R, be in the mp3 format, and must be no larger than five megabytes. Applicants may only submit one file for each mark.

When examined, sound marks will be evaluated for both the sonic elements as well as any lyrical elements.

Similarly, applicants for motion marks may submit a series of pictures that serve as frames showing how the mark moves. The JPO will accept up to 99 frames depicting the mark’s movements. These frames, rather than being evaluated individually, will be considered as a whole mark.

Distinctiveness will be an especially important issue for non-traditional marks. The JPO representatives said that single color and color combination marks are generally considered non-distinctive, although applicants may establish distinctiveness through use. In fact, the JPO has recommended that this may be the likeliest way to secure such a registration.

However, the test will be very stringent. The evidence establishing proof of prior use must be practically identical to the registration; even small differences would likely lead the examiner to find that there was no distinctiveness established by prior use.

As of yesterday, no non-traditional marks have been granted, but the JPO representatives said that they hope to be back next year with an update on how the office is handling these new applications.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm is continuing its aggressive IP hiring streak with the addition of partner Matthew Rizzolo
Pantech counsel Shogo Matsunaga speaks exclusively to Managing IP about how his team proved Google’s unwillingness, and ultimately secured a landmark SEP settlement
New partners, including the firm’s first female head of a department, are eyeing a deeper focus on client understanding
Chunguang Hu of China PAT explains why his ‘insider’ experience as a patent examiner benefits clients and why he wants to debunk the myth that IP has limited value in China
Essenese Obhan shares his expansion plans and vision of creating a ‘one-stop shop’ for clients after Indian firms Obhan & Associates and Mason & Associates joined forces
From AI and the UPC to troublesome trademarks in China, experts name the IP trends likely to dominate 2026
Colm Murphy says he is keen to help clients navigate cross-border IP challenges in Europe
With 2025 behind us, US practitioners sit down with Managing IP to discuss the major IP moments from the year and what to expect in 2026
Large-scale transatlantic mergers will give US entities a strong foothold at the UPC, and could spark further fragmentation of European patent practices
This year’s most-read stories covered uncertainty at the USPTO, a potential boycott of a major international IP conference, rankings releases, and a contempt of court proceeding
Gift this article