Hong Kong: Original grant patent system is introduced
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Hong Kong: Original grant patent system is introduced

original-grant-patent-min-final.jpg

The Hong Kong Intellectual Property Department (HKIPD) made major reforms to the patent system in Hong Kong in December 2019, with the introduction of the original grant patent (OGP) system. The OGP system provides a direct filing route for an application for a standard patent (O) in Hong Kong and will be offered in parallel with the re-registration route. This reform is an important development that brings the Hong Kong patent system in line with other major patent offices. It is expected to better support innovation and technology development in Hong Kong.

The new substantive examination

Under the new system, substantive examination is a prerequisite for the grant of a standard patent (O). The HKIPD issued Patent Examination Guidelines (guidelines), which include the principles and practices of the registrar when carrying out substantive examination.

Among other requirements, an invention is patentable in Hong Kong if it is novel, involves an inventive step, and is susceptible to industrial application. The standard for novelty aligns with the standards of most major patent offices, and the Registry considers the state of the art based on the public disclosure in Hong Kong and elsewhere in the world. The Registry disregards public disclosures of the invention made within the six month grace period from the earliest priority date if the public disclosure was an evident abuse or made by the applicant or any proprietor of the invention at a prescribed exhibition or meeting.

For assessing the inventive step of the claimed invention, the Registry generally applies the Pozzoli approach (Pozzoli Spa v BDMO SA [2007] EWCA Civ 588) from the Court of Appeal in the United Kingdom. This approach was also adopted by the Hong Kong courts as precedent. The Pozzoli approach requires the identification of a person skilled in the art and the relevant common general knowledge of such a person. The assessment is based on a hypothetical person having the skills in the technical field, but not having an inventive mind. The examiner will consider the inventive concept of the claims and the respective technical contribution to the art. Therefore a set of properly drafted claims is crucial for highlighting the inventive concept of the invention.

Other requirements, such as sufficiency of disclosure, unity of invention, and double patenting, should also be well considered before filing a standard patent (O) application in Hong Kong. In particular, the guidelines prohibit the granting of two patents for one invention made by the same inventor(s). Therefore, the Registry will not grant a standard patent (O) if a short-term patent is already granted for an invention with the same scope of substance.

Extended priority claim

In this reform, the rules with respect to priority claims are also amended. An applicant may request restoration of a priority right if an application is filed within two months after the expiry of the 12-month priority period. However, under Section 31B(2)(b)(ii) of the Patent (General) Rules (rules), the restoration application must be filed with evidence showing why the application was not duly filed before the expiry of the 12-month priority period. It is uncertain how the Registry will exercise its discretion on applications filed within two months after the expiry of the priority period.

Multiple independent and dependent claims

Under the new system, unlike a Hong Kong short-term patent application in which the total number of independent claims must not exceed two under Section 113(1A)(b)(ii) of the Patents Ordinance (Ordinance) and Section 58(2)(b) of the rules, a set of claims in a patent specification for a standard patent (O) application may include multiple independent claims. In addition, there is no specific limitation on the total number of independent and dependent claims contained in a standard patent (O) application, and no excess claim fees are required. However, Section 78(1)(b) of the Ordinance requires the claims contained in the specification of a patent application or a patent to be concise. Section 31S(7) of the rules further requires that the number of claims must be reasonable. Therefore, an objection may be raised if there is an unreasonably large number of claims.

In Hong Kong, an invention can be protected by a standard patent or a short-term patent. A standard patent can now be filed directly using the newly launched OGP system, which operates in parallel with the re-registration route. The OGP system has the advantage of providing a direct and economical route to acquiring patent protection in Hong Kong.

johnchung.jpg
tonyho.jpg
stanleyyip.jpg

John Chung

Tony Ho

Stanley Yip


more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
Law firms that pay close attention to their client relationships are more likely to win repeat work, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
The EMEA research period is open until May 31
Practitioners analyse a survey on how law firms prove value to their clients and reflect on why the concept can be hard to pin down
The winner of Managing IP’s Life Achievement Award discusses 50 years in IP law and how even he can’t avoid imposter syndrome
Saya Choudhary of Singh & Singh explains how her team navigated nine years of litigation to secure record damages of $29 million and the lessons learned along the way
The full list of finalists has been revealed and the winners will be presented on June 20 at the Metropolitan Club in New York
A team of IP and media law specialists has joined from SKW Schwarz alongside a former counsel at Sky
The Irish government has delayed a planned referendum on whether Ireland should join the Unified Patent Court, prompting concern about when a vote may take place
With more than 250 winners recognised during the ceremony, there are many reasons to be positive about the health of the IP industry in EMEA
Gift this article