Henry Carr: “I would never have had a day like that as a barrister”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Henry Carr: “I would never have had a day like that as a barrister”

Mr Justice Henry Carr

In an exclusive interview with Managing IP, the High Court justice says the onus is on senior judges to encourage top IP professionals to step up to the judiciary if the system is to be saved

Mr Justice Henry Carr dismisses the misconceptions about the life of a judge being lonely, saying it’s extremely collegiate and sociable and that he loves the variety of the role.

“Often I come home at the end of a day and think, ‘I would never have had a day like that as a barrister. I’m not trying to sell anything, not trying to push anything, just trying to do the right thing,’” he says.

He “loves” the fact that one week he might hear a case about patents and then the next week one on trademarks, “and then I’ll hear something very interesting about insolvency, then tax, then landlord and tenant.”

Carr, an IP specialist by trade but who is not exclusively an IP judge at the England & Wales High Court, says that attracting more top talent to the judiciary requires senior judges to sell the role.

In a wide-ranging interview, which will be published in full this week, Carr also says that:

·       He gets irritated when he is interrupted in court;

·       Good points get lost because of legal teams’ approaches;

·       Writing a full judgment takes twice as long as the trial;

·       He finds foreign IP developments very influential; and

·       AI offers a big opportunity to remove the “drudgery” of cases.  

This is the second in our series of judge interviews. You can read the first, with Mr Justice Arnold, here.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

On a recent trip to the French capital, we learned that the UPC is squeezing domestic litigation while firms are chasing senior talent, experimenting with AI and considering new ways of organising their practices
Daniel Law says a string of lateral hires and broader expansion plans will strengthen its position to capitalise on Brazil’s burgeoning IP and patent litigation market
Jason Raeburn’s arrival will expand the firm’s London footprint in AI, copyright and tech disputes
The firm is shaping its AI strategy around partnerships with Harvey and Legora alongside internally developed tools from its legal technology company, Eltemate
A dispute Down Under shows why trademark lawyers cannot afford to wait on the sidelines when a rival brand gathers momentum
The Third Circuit’s decision in Thomson Reuters v ROSS marks the first appellate-level decision addressing AI and fair use, prompting copyright counsel to consider arguments around potential licensing markets
Injunctions for HandsFree Labs and Align Technology come as the Court of Appeal warns that busy teams must have the staffing and resources to meet UPC deadlines
The chief technology officer remit, which has been created as the firm is building its litigation team, will include expanding the use of AI in patent and legal work and automating manual processes
Former Hoyng Rokh Moneiger partner Laura Alonso, who brought her team to ECIJA in March, discusses plans to expand further and why ECIJA’s ‘IP DNA’ is helping broaden her work
Amita Haylock discusses building an integrated Asia practice as clients increasingly demand that firms combine IP, technology and data expertise
Gift this article