Henry Carr: “I would never have had a day like that as a barrister”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Henry Carr: “I would never have had a day like that as a barrister”

Mr Justice Henry Carr

In an exclusive interview with Managing IP, the High Court justice says the onus is on senior judges to encourage top IP professionals to step up to the judiciary if the system is to be saved

Mr Justice Henry Carr dismisses the misconceptions about the life of a judge being lonely, saying it’s extremely collegiate and sociable and that he loves the variety of the role.

“Often I come home at the end of a day and think, ‘I would never have had a day like that as a barrister. I’m not trying to sell anything, not trying to push anything, just trying to do the right thing,’” he says.

He “loves” the fact that one week he might hear a case about patents and then the next week one on trademarks, “and then I’ll hear something very interesting about insolvency, then tax, then landlord and tenant.”

Carr, an IP specialist by trade but who is not exclusively an IP judge at the England & Wales High Court, says that attracting more top talent to the judiciary requires senior judges to sell the role.

In a wide-ranging interview, which will be published in full this week, Carr also says that:

·       He gets irritated when he is interrupted in court;

·       Good points get lost because of legal teams’ approaches;

·       Writing a full judgment takes twice as long as the trial;

·       He finds foreign IP developments very influential; and

·       AI offers a big opportunity to remove the “drudgery” of cases.  

This is the second in our series of judge interviews. You can read the first, with Mr Justice Arnold, here.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article