Henry Carr: “I would never have had a day like that as a barrister”

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Henry Carr: “I would never have had a day like that as a barrister”

Mr Justice Henry Carr

In an exclusive interview with Managing IP, the High Court justice says the onus is on senior judges to encourage top IP professionals to step up to the judiciary if the system is to be saved

Mr Justice Henry Carr dismisses the misconceptions about the life of a judge being lonely, saying it’s extremely collegiate and sociable and that he loves the variety of the role.

“Often I come home at the end of a day and think, ‘I would never have had a day like that as a barrister. I’m not trying to sell anything, not trying to push anything, just trying to do the right thing,’” he says.

He “loves” the fact that one week he might hear a case about patents and then the next week one on trademarks, “and then I’ll hear something very interesting about insolvency, then tax, then landlord and tenant.”

Carr, an IP specialist by trade but who is not exclusively an IP judge at the England & Wales High Court, says that attracting more top talent to the judiciary requires senior judges to sell the role.

In a wide-ranging interview, which will be published in full this week, Carr also says that:

·       He gets irritated when he is interrupted in court;

·       Good points get lost because of legal teams’ approaches;

·       Writing a full judgment takes twice as long as the trial;

·       He finds foreign IP developments very influential; and

·       AI offers a big opportunity to remove the “drudgery” of cases.  

This is the second in our series of judge interviews. You can read the first, with Mr Justice Arnold, here.


more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Drew & Napier’s leadership appointments show one way full-service firms can back up claims about the strategic importance of IP
Strike-out application will hear claims that the copyright aspect of an IP infringement claim brought by a gambling and sports betting group should be dropped
Amongst a sea of mergers, Lathrop GPM and HG Law have set out plans to combine, positioning themselves to compete with both IP boutiques and full-service firms
Patrícia Paias explains why she loves the science and business behind an idea and why potential rights owners must avoid the ‘file and forget’ philosophy
Lawyers eagerly await news of what IP specialist Sir Colin Birss will bring to one of the England and Wales judiciary’s most important roles
María Aurora García of Berken IP explains how intellectual property rights holders can use customs monitoring and online enforcement tools to identify parallel imports and support compliance with consumer protection rules
The Jakarta-based firm says personal networks and a distinctive strategy can help it guide foreign clients through what can be a tricky IP landscape
Munich litigation boutique formed by former Taylor Wessing partners continues expansion as it seeks to cement its position in the UPC market
Yvonne Tang and Siau Wen Lim, the second and third IP specialists to sit on the firm’s management committee, say IP is ‘uniquely positioned’ to support cross-practice work
As competing firms come under common ownership, clients may care less about formal conflicts and more about how openly firms discuss them
Gift this article