Qualcomm, Apple and Google soar up patent assignee rankings

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Qualcomm, Apple and Google soar up patent assignee rankings

Technology firms are rising quickly up the ranking of firms with the most patents granted in the US, according to new data published by IFI Claims Patent Services.

IFI Claims Patent Services has today revealed the ranking of the top 50 firms for patents granted in 2013.

According to IFI figures, the USPTO issued a record 277,835 utility patents in 2013, up about 10% on 2012 and the most issued in a single year. A total of 18 US firms made the top 50 list in 2013, up from 17 in 2012 and 2011.

IFI figures reveal that IBM remains comfortably the biggest patent assignee, continuing a dominance that has lasted 21 years. It was granted 6,809 patents in 2013, up 5% from 6,478 in 2012. But technology firms are catching up fast.

“You are seeing big growth in companies like Qualcomm, Google, Apple and Blackberry,” Mike Baycroft, CEO of IFI Claims Patent Services, told Managing IP. “Even as you go down the list, there are companies like AT&T and Verizon growing. Ten years ago it was pharma that was growing. Now it seems to be the high-tech mobile companies.”

Qualcomm shot up eight places to ninth in the ranking in 2013 from 17th in 2012. The California-based telecommunications firm’s number of patents granted grew 62% to 2,103 from 1,292.

Google moved 10 places up the ranking, to 11th from 21st. Its figure of 1,851 patents granted in 2013 was up 61% on the 1,151 patents granted in 2012.

Apple rose nine places to 13th in the rankings from 22nd in 2012. It had 1,775 patents granted in 2013, up 56% on 2012’s 1,136.

The rise of Google and Apple in the patent assignee ranking has pushed them ahead of long time Silicon Valley patent leaders Hewlett-Packard and Intel.

BlackBerry entered the top 25 this year, moving up to 20th from 29th in 2012. Its number of patents granted increased 35% to 1,334 in 2013 from 986 in 2012. “It is surprising BlackBerry has not slowed down because it is under stress,” noted Baycroft.

Samsung remained in second place, although its number of patents granted fell to 4,675 in 2013 from 5,081 the year before. However, the South Korean electronic giant’s number of patents applied for in 2013 rose to 5,753, from 5,532 in 2012.

Further down the list is Samsung Display. Its 1,270 patents filed put it in 22nd place in the 2013 rankings. This was up greatly from 123rd place with 238 patents filed in 2012. Samsung Display was formed from the spin-off of Samsung’s LCD display business in 2012, which established the unit as a separate subsidiary under the Samsung umbrella.

Canon and Sony remained in third and fourth place in the rankings, respectively, with both firms’ number of patents granted increasing.

Microsoft and Panasonic swapped the fifth and sixth places. Microsoft was granted 2,660 patents in 2013, up from 2,613 in 2012. Panasonic’s number of patents granted fell to 2,601 in 2013 from 2,769 in 2012.

Notable high movers further down the rankings were healthcare products maker Covidien moving up 463 places to 46th place, with its 743 patents granted up from a mere 57 in 2012, and Amazon Technologies, which moved up to 59th place in the ranking from 103rd, with 530 patents granted in 2013 up from 287 in 2012.

Notable firms to fall down the rankings were General Electric, which fell five places to 14th, and Hitachi, which fell 13 places to 26th spot.

The statistics are for granted patents and do not include re-issued patents.

The figures do not group subsidiaries of companies together, but rather lists each subsidiary separately. This may explain why no firms that are seen as patent trolls are prominent in the list.

“There are no trolls in the top 50,” said Baycroft. “However, if in fact Intellectual Ventures consolidated their assignments in a single assignee they would probably show up in this list. Someone like Sony goes out of their way to make sure they file under a single name, but someone like Intellectual Ventures does not.”

The ranking of the top 1,000 patent assignees is available on IFI’s website by registering here.

Managing IP will be publishing a more in-depth analysis of firms’ patent filing strategies in its February issue, including interviews with leading in-house counsel and rankings of which law firms are used most by the top 25 patent filers.

Rank 2013

Rank 2012

Change

Assignee

cc

Patents granted 2013

Patents granted 2012

1

1

0

International Business Machines Corp

US

6809

6478

2

2

0

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd KR

KR

4675

5081

3

3

0

Canon K K JP

JP

3825

3174

4

4

0

Sony Corp JP

JP

3098

3032

5

6

1

Microsoft Corp

US

2660

2613

6

5

-1

Panasonic Corp JP

JP

2601

2769

7

7

0

Toshiba Corp JP

JP

2416

2447

8

8

0

Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd TW

TW

2279

2013

9

17

8

QUALCOMM Inc

US

2103

1292

10

10

0

LG Electronics Inc KR

KR

1947

1624

11

21

10

Google Inc

US

1851

1151

12

11

-1

Fujitsu Ltd JP

JP

1806

1535

13

22

9

Apple Inc

US

1775

1136

14

9

-5

General Electric Co

US

1739

1652

15

16

1

GM Global Technology Operations LLC

US

1626

1377

16

12

-4

Seiko Epson Corp JP

JP

1494

1461

17

14

-3

Ricoh Co Ltd JP

JP

1470

1410

18

18

0

Intel Corp

US

1455

1290

19

15

-4

Hewlett-Packard Development Co L P

US

1360

1394

20

29

9

BlackBerry Ltd CA

CA

1334

986

21

19

-2

Toyota Jidosha K K JP

JP

1284

1285

22

123

101

Samsung Display Co Ltd KR

KR

1270

238

23

35

12

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson SE

SE

1149

843

24

24

0

Sharp K K JP

JP

1132

1118

25

23

-2

Honda Motor Co Ltd JP

JP

1121

1132

Source: IFI Claims Patent Services

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
A boom in transactional work and a heightened awareness of IP have helped boost revenue for the rebranded commercial services team
Clemens Heusch, head of global litigation and dispute resolution at Nokia, tells us why open conversations – and respectful challenges – lead to the best results
Siegmund Gutman, who joined Mintz one year ago, explains the firm’s approach to life sciences litigation and what it means for hiring plans
The merger of two IP boutiques could prompt others to follow suit and challenge Australia’s externally funded firms
Gift this article