Life in ‘fast forward’: combining law, tech and problem solving

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Life in ‘fast forward’: combining law, tech and problem solving

Khawand.png

Hady Khawand, founder of AÏP Genius, discusses creating an AI-powered IP platform, and why, with the law evolving faster than ever, adaptability is key

Welcome to the latest instalment of Managing IP’s ‘Five minutes with’ series, where we learn more about intellectual property practitioners on a personal and professional level.

This time, we meet Hady Khawand, founder of AÏP Genius in Bahrain.

Someone asks you at a party what you do for a living. What do you say?

I usually say I work at the intersection of law and technology, trying to make the world of intellectual property a little less mysterious – and a lot more efficient.

Talk us through a typical working day.

There’s no ‘typical’ anymore. My days jump between product strategy for AÏP Genius, team standup meetings, speaking with global IP owners, analysing how our AI is interpreting new legal updates, and then occasionally shifting back into academic mode for my PhD research. It’s a blend of law, technology, and problem-solving – on fast-forward.

What are you working on at the moment?

Building and scaling AÏP Genius, an AI-powered ecosystem for IP advisory, search, filing, and portfolio management. At the same time, I’m finalising the next phase of my PhD work on IP strategy and SME exits in the Gulf. Both projects feed into each other: one is practice, the other is theory.

Does one big piece of work usually take priority, or are you juggling multiple things?

It’s constant juggling – but with clear priorities. When you’re building a vertical-AI platform in a field as fragmented as IP, everything matters: product, clients, regulatory frameworks, partnerships, research. The trick is knowing which ball can fall to the ground and which absolutely cannot.

What is the most exciting aspect of your role, and what is the most stressful?

The exciting part is shaping how IP services will work in the future – faster, fairer, more transparent, and genuinely user-centric. I don’t label any part of my role as ‘stressful’, but there are real challenges: building technology for a sector that wasn’t designed for automation, and encouraging in-house teams and IP firms to step out of their comfort zone and engage with a new operating model. These challenges energise me more than they drain me, especially when tackled with the team.

Tell us the key characteristics that make a successful IP lawyer/practitioner.

Curiosity, precision, and patience. IP rewards people who can see the big picture yet obsess over the smallest detail. And today, adaptability is just as important – the law is evolving faster than ever.

What is the most common misconception about IP?

That it’s only about registering rights. In reality, registration is the easy part. The strategy behind what to protect, when, where, and why – and how to turn those rights into value – is where IP actually starts to matter. 

What or who inspires you?

People who build things that didn’t exist before – founders, researchers, policymakers who push boundaries with responsibility. And my students, their questions always force me to rethink “established truths”.

If you weren’t in IP, what would you be doing?

Probably something that still mixes analysis, creativity, and systems thinking – maybe teaching full-time or working on another venture involving technology and regulation. I doubt I’d survive in a slow-moving industry.

Any advice you would give your younger self?

Take bolder risks earlier. And worry less about perfection –clarity and momentum matter more.

What is your motto in life?

Lead with integrity and design a world where humans and AI amplify each other.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Anousha Davies, associate and trademark attorney at Birketts, unpicks how the university’s reputation enabled it to see off a proposed trademark for ‘Cambridge Rowing’
IP lawyers, who say they are encouraging clients to build up ‘tariff resilience’, should treat the risks posed by recent orders as a core consideration in cross-border licensing
Regulatory changes and damages risks are prompting Canadian firms and clients to opt for settlements in generic and biosimilar cases
News of Via Licensing Alliance adding two new members and Nokia’s proposal to extend interim licences to Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount were also among the top talking points
A new claim filed by Ericsson, and a request for access to documents, were also among recent developments
Cooley and Stikeman Elliott advised 35Pharma on the deal, which will allow GSK to get its hands on S235, an investigational medicine for pulmonary hypertension
Simon Wright explains why the UK should embrace the possibility of rejoining the UPC, and reveals how CIPA is reacting to this month’s historic Emotional Perception AI case at the UK Supreme Court
Matthew Grady of Wolf Greenfield says AI presents an opportunity in patent practice for stronger collaboration between in-house and outside counsel
Aparna Watal, head of trademarks at Halfords IP, discusses why lawyers must take a stand when advising clients and how she balances work, motherhood and mentoring
Discussion hosted by Bird & Bird partners also hears that UK courts’ desire to determine FRAND rates could see the jurisdiction penalised in a similar way to China
Gift this article