Analysis: Was the Federal Circuit’s Aqua Products opinion a wash out?
The Federal Circuit’s en banc Aqua Products v Matal ruling has been described as “a complete non-event” and “a real mess” that “did little to resolve the big questions” surrounding the PTAB's treatment of motions to amend. However, it did shift the burden of persuasion to the petitioner, while some believe the Chevron implications of the decision are most interesting
The Federal Circuit’s 148-page Aqua Products v
Matal en banc opinion was a long time
coming. Oral arguments took
place in December 2016.
The unusually long wait suggested that the eventual ruling
would be complicated. This...
Please log in
to read the rest of this article. New to Managing Intellectual Property?
Take advantage of free access to up to 5 articles on Managing IP and become a member today. It’s free to join and the benefits start straight away.
Please make sure you log in to read the rest of the article.
Join us nowGain FREE access to up to five free articles when you register now.