InternationalUSRemember you can easily switch between MIP US and MIP International at any time

Managing IP Global Awards 2016: the winners



James Nurton, London


Managing IP's 2016 Global Awards Dinner was held at The Savoy, London on March 10

Awards 2016 drinks picThe winners of the awards presented on the night are listed below. See more updates and photos on Twitter (#mipawards).

Further information about all the winners, and photos from the dinner, will be published online next month and in the May issue of Managing IP.

You can also read the shortlists for all the categories.

Awards for the United States and Canada will be presented at the North America Awards in Washington DC next week; read the shortlists online.

National awards

Argentina Marval O’Farrell & Mairal
Australia Prosecution Davies Collison Cave
Australia Contentious Work Herbert Smith Freehills
Austria Schwarz Schönherr Rechtsanwälte
Belgium Contentious Work Hoyng Rokh Monegier
Benelux Trade Mark Prosecution NLO Shieldmark
Brazil Dannemann Siemsen Bigler & Ipanema Moreira
Chile Sargent & Krahn
China Prosecution Liu Shen & Associates
China Contentious Work King & Wood Mallesons
China IP Transactional Work Ropes & Gray
China Foreign Law Firm Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
Colombia Brigard & Castro
Denmark Plesner
Finland Roschier
France Prosecution Regimbeau
France Contentious Work August & Debouzy
Germany Prosecution Hoffmann Eitle
Germany Contentious Work Hogan Lovells
Hong Kong Deacons
Hungary Danubia
India Prosecution Remfry & Sagar
India Contentious Work Anand & Anand
Indonesia SKC Law
Ireland A&L Goodbody
Italy Prosecution Società Italiana Brevetti
Italy Contentious Work Trevisan & Cuonzo
Japan Prosecution Nakamura & Partners
Japan Contentious Work TMI Associates
Japan Foreign Firm Hogan Lovells
Malaysia Skrine
Mexico Copyright  Olivares
Mexico Patent Basham Ringe & Correa
Mexico Trade Mark Olivares
New Zealand AJ Park
Norway Bryn Aarflot
Peru Barreda Moller
Poland Polservice
Romania Nestor Nestor Diculescu Kingston Petersen
Russia Gowling WLG
Scotland Brodies
Singapore Prosecution Marks & Clerk
Singapore Contentious Work Drew & Napier   
South Africa Spoor & Fisher
South Korea Prosecution Kim & Chang
South Korea Contentious Work Kim & Chang
Spain Prosecution Elzaburu
Spain Contentious Work Clifford Chance
Sweden Groth & Co
Switzerland Homburger
Taiwan Lee and Li
Thailand Baker & McKenzie
The Netherlands Patent Prosecution V.O.
The Netherlands Contentious Work Brinkhof
The Philippines SyCip Salazar Hernandez & Gatmaitan
Turkey Gün + Partners
UK – IP Set 8 New Square
UK Patent Prosecution Abel & Imray
UK Trade Mark Prosecution Stobbs IP
UK Patent Contentious Work Powell Gilbert
UK Trade Mark Contentious Work Bird & Bird
UK Copyright Olswang
United Arab Emirates Clyde & Co
Vietnam Tilleke & Gibbins

Regional awards

Africa Adams & Adams
Asia-Pacific  King & Wood Mallesons
Latin America Firm to Watch Kasznar Leonardos
Middle East Saba Intellectual Property
Scandinavia Zacco
Europe Patent Hoyng Rokh Monegier
Europe Trade Mark  Taylor Wessing
Europe Copyright  Baker & McKenzie
Global Firm of the Year Finnegan

Special awards

Outstanding Achievement Professor Joachim Bornkamm
Outstanding Achievement Margot Frohlinger
In-House Team Imperial Innovations


Comments






profile

Managing IP

ManagingIP

ManagingIP profile

John Bochnovic, Executive Director of AIPPI, has resigned from the position (effective April 30, 2018) to return to… https://t.co/4dp8lsqg5Z

Feb 16 2018 04:19 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

CAFC says 101 inquiry is a factual determination in “blockbuster” Berkheimer opinion https://t.co/wpYscoUhnY https://t.co/FPrkImTmGL

Feb 16 2018 03:13 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
ManagingIP profile

US falls to 12th in US Chamber patent ranking https://t.co/UP7AvAbZ4k Expect to hear this figure mentioned a lot at… https://t.co/gnWLDdISl2

Feb 15 2018 04:45 ·  reply ·  retweet ·  favourite
More from the Managing IP blog


null null null

null null null

February 2018

FRAND aid: Is the European Commission’s SEP guidance useful?

Both patent owners and implementers have welcomed the European Commission’s communication on standard essential patents. Does that mean it has successfully balanced competing interests or merely dodged the difficult questions? James Nurton investigates



Most read articles

Supplements