Mexico: Pay attention to authorisation letters
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Mexico: Pay attention to authorisation letters

On September 30 2015, the Mexican Internal Revenue Service published in the Official Federal Gazette updated foreign commerce dispositions including those applicable to products such as jewellery, clothing, footwear, tobacco products, alcoholic beverages, pharmaceuticals and software, regarding the obligation to state the principal word mark, design, name-and-design or three-dimensional mark in the manifesto exhibited to Customs. The effective date of the dispositions was November 1.

The rules prescribe that the manifesto shall indicate: if the trader (i) is the owner of the trade mark, (ii) is a licensee of the trade mark owner, (iii) has a trade mark application at the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) and (iv) if the product does not bear any trade mark or it is not registered in Mexico. Likewise, if the trader does not belong to the regular chain of distribution of the trade mark owner (in the case of parallel imports), it is mandatory to state that the product is authentic. Note parallel imports are legal in Mexico.

Notwithstanding that the rules do not prescribe the obligation to attach any document to the importation/exportation manifesto, Mexican licensed Customs brokers are requiring their clients to exhibit an "authorisation letter" signed by the owner of the registered trade mark, and sometimes they only accept a letter executed by the representative who filed the application at IMPI. Customs brokers argue that shipments are suspended by Customs due to the lack of such a letter. However, Mexican Customs recognises its lack of authority to request that letter or to seize goods due to IP infringements without a warrant granted by IMPI or the Federal Attorney General's Office. This is because the letter is for the broker's own protection.

Therefore, it is strongly advised to analyse in which cases a trade mark owner will authorise an "authorisation letter" to be signed to ease the traffic of goods, review its terms, and bear in mind that a letter written in open terms may be misused in many ways by third parties.

Rangel-Sergio

Sergio Rangel


OlivaresPedro Luis Ogazón No 17Col San Angel01000 México DFTel: +5255 53 22 30 00Fax: +5255 53 22 30 01olivlaw@olivares.com.mxwww.olivares.com.mx

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Mary Till, a former legal advisor at the USPTO who has joined Finnegan this week, is looking forward to providing clients with a USPTO perspective
IP in-house counsel who receive lots of pitches from AI vendors explain how they review them – or why they ignore them
Anna Sosis discusses the importance of IP education and explains why, away from IP, she could see herself becoming a mindfulness teacher
Cross-border judicial collaboration and EU copyright were hot topics on the second day of the EUIPO’s 5th IP Case Law Conference
Nancy Linck, who is 82, explains why she found something new to excite her at Carmichael IP
On day one of the EUIPO’s Case Law Conference, delegates heard why single-letter trademarks are weak and received an update on the EU’s design law shakeup
High-earning businesses place most value on the depth of the external legal teams advising them, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
Kilpatrick Townsend was recognised as Americas firm of the year, while patent powerhouse James Haley won a lifetime achievement award
Partners at Foley Hoag and Kilburn & Strode explore how US and UK courts have addressed questions of AI and inventorship
In-house lawyers have considerable influence over law firms’ actions, so they must use that power to push their external advisers to adopt sustainable practices
Gift this article