Singapore designated PCT international search authority
Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2024

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Singapore designated PCT international search authority

Singapore and WIPO have entered into an agreement to designate the IP Office of Singapore (IPOS) a PCT international search authority

IPOS will be the fifth Asia-based international searching authority (ISA) and the first in Southeast Asia. It is expected to be running by early next year.

The other Asian ISAs are in China, Japan, Korea and India. The JPO is the second most popular ISA in the PCT system with an estimated 20.7% of all international searches in 2013, while the Korean Intellectual Property Office is third with 14.8%. The EPO is the most popular office in the world for PCT international searches with 37.7% of all searches.

Singapore will be one of several new ISAs to go live in the last two years. Israel’s patent office started performing international searches in 2012, generating 360 international search reports in 2012 and an estimated 816 in 2013. The Indian (est 107 reports) and Egyptian (est 13 reports) patent offices also became active as ISAs last year.

Singapore has made several changes in the last few years in response to the globalising market. In 2012, it amended its laws to allow foreign qualified patent agents located in Singapore to draft patents for other jurisdictions without having to meet local registration requirements. At the same time, Singapore also became a positive grant patent regime and as part of that process developed its own in-house patent examination capacity.

This new agreement to become a PCT ISA appears to be another step in the process, specifically with an eye toward China. According to a press release issued by the IP Office of Singapore, about 25% of its examiners can conduct prior art searches in Chinese.

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Justin Davidson and Stanley Ng of Norton Rose Fulbright discuss what China’s recent Ultraman ruling does and doesn’t say about who is responsible when an AI system infringes copyright
Former in-house counsel reveal how consultancy work helped them win new business and how they cut through the stigma surrounding the job title
In-house counsel discuss the law firm billing practices that will win them over and the ones that drive them away
If the deal goes through, one group will manage more than 50% of patent filings in Australia and employ more than a quarter of patent attorneys in Australia and New Zealand
Siegmund Gutman, former chair of the life sciences patent group at Proskauer, is among a group of 10 lawyers to join Mintz Levin
A patent dispute between two manufacturing companies has shown that teething problems with the UPC’s case management system have not abated
Lawyers weigh in on the USPTO’s request for comment on the effects of AI on prior art analysis and obviousness determinations
A vast majority of corporates – especially smaller businesses – rely on a trusted referral when instructing external counsel, according to a survey of nearly 29,000 in-house counsel
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
The Munich Regional Court ruled that Lenovo was an unwilling licensee and had engaged in ‘holdout’ tactics
Gift this article